arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2203.10070

Kernelization for Treewidth-2 Vertex Deletion

Abstract

The Treewidth-2 Vertex Deletion problem asks whether a set of at most $t$ vertices can be removed from a graph, such that the resulting graph has treewidth at most two. A graph has treewidth at most two if and only if it does not contain a $K_4$ minor. Hence, this problem corresponds to the NP-hard $\mathcal{F}$-Minor Cover problem with $\mathcal{F} = \{K_4\}$. For any variant of the $\mathcal{F}$-Minor Cover problem where $\mathcal{F}$ contains a planar graph, it is known that a polynomial kernel exists. I.e., a preprocessing routine that in polynomial time outputs an equivalent instance of size $t^{O(1)}$. However, this proof is non-constructive, meaning that this proof does not yield an explicit bound on the kernel size. The $\{K_4\}$-Minor Cover problem is the simplest variant of the $\mathcal{F}$-Minor Cover problem with an unknown kernel size. To develop a constructive kernelization algorithm, we present a new method to decompose graphs into near-protrusions, such that near-protrusions in this new decomposition can be reduced using elementary reduction rules. Our method extends the `approximation and tidying' framework by van Bevern et al. [Algorithmica 2012] to provide guarantees stronger than those provided by both this framework and a regular protrusion decomposition. Furthermore, we provide extensions of the elementary reduction rules used by the $\{K_4, K_{2,3}\}$-Minor Cover kernelization algorithm introduced by Donkers et al. [IPEC 2021]. Using the new decomposition method and reduction rules, we obtain a kernel consisting of $O(t^{41})$ vertices, which is the first constructive kernel. This kernel is a step towards more concrete kernelization bounds for the $\mathcal{F}$-Minor Cover problem where $\mathcal{F}$ contains a planar graph, and our decomposition provides a potential direction to achieve these new bounds.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jeroen L. G. Schols. 2022-03-18. Kernelization for Treewidth-2 Vertex Deletion. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.10070

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS