arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2202.13795

A review on geometric constraint solving

Qiang Zou·Zhihong Tang·Hsi-Yung Feng·Shuming Gao·Chenchu Zhou·Yusheng Liu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive review of geometric constraint solving in parametric computer-aided design (CAD), with the major focus on its advances in the last 15 years. Geometric constraint solving can date back to the very first CAD prototype, Sketchpad, in the 1960s, but serious research studies were carried out only after parametric CAD was introduced in the late 1980s. In the following 30-year history of GCS research, two development stages may be identified: (1) the first 15 years (late 1980s - mid 2000s) were primarily devoted to geometric constraint decomposition for well-constrained systems or those with only structural constraint dependencies; and (2) the second 15 years (late 2000s - now) have seen research efforts shifted towards classification criteria and decomposition algorithms for general constraint systems (with and without non-structural constraint dependencies). Most existing reviews focused on the first 15 years. The problem researched in the second 15 years is, however, equally important, considering that a manually specified constraint system usually contains under- and over-constrained parts, and that such parts must be correctly detected and resolved before numerical solving can work. In this regard, this review paper covers both stages and will discusses what has already been made possible for handling general constraint systems, what developments can be expected in the near future, and which areas remain problematic.

Explore related subjects

cs.CG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Qiang Zou, Zhihong Tang, Hsi-Yung Feng, Shuming Gao, Chenchu Zhou, Yusheng Liu. 2022-02-28. A review on geometric constraint solving. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.13795

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG↗