A Market Mechanism for Trading Flexibility Between Interconnected Electricity Markets

Hossein Khazaei; Ceyhun Eksin; Roohallah Khatami; Alfredo Garcia

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2202.13720

A Market Mechanism for Trading Flexibility Between Interconnected Electricity Markets

Hossein Khazaei·Ceyhun Eksin·Roohallah Khatami·Alfredo Garcia

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Electricity markets differ in their ability to meet power imbalances in short notice in a controlled fashion. Relatively flexible markets have the ability to ramp up (or down) power flows across interties without compromising their ability to reliably meet internal demand. In this paper, a market mechanism to enable flexibility trading amongst market operators is introduced. In the proposed market mechanism, market operators exchange information regarding optimal terms of trade (nodal prices and flows) along interconnection lines at every trading round. Equipped with this information, each market operator then independently solves its own internal chance-constrained economic dispatch problem and broadcasts the updated optimal terms of trade for flows across markets. We show the proposed decentralized market mechanism for flexibility trading converges to a Nash equilibrium of the intraday market coupling game, i.e. a combination of internal market clearing solutions (one for each participating market) and flows and prices along interconnection lines so that no individual market operator has an incentive to modify its own internal solution and/or the terms of trade along interties. For a specific class of chance constraints, we show that the limiting equilibrium outcome is efficient, i.e. it corresponds to the solution of the single market clearing problem for all participating markets. The proposed market mechanism is illustrated with an application to the three-area IEEE Reliability Test System.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Hossein Khazaei, Ceyhun Eksin, Roohallah Khatami, Alfredo Garcia. 2022-02-28. A Market Mechanism for Trading Flexibility Between Interconnected Electricity Markets. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.13720

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗