arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2202.13298

Approximation Algorithms for Flexible Graph Connectivity

Abstract

We present approximation algorithms for several network design problems in the model of Flexible Graph Connectivity (Adjiashvili, Hommelsheim and M\"uhlenthaler, "Flexible Graph Connectivity", Math. Program. pp. 1-33 (2021), and IPCO 2020: pp. 13-26). Let $k\geq 1$, $p\geq 1$ and $q\geq 0$ be integers. In an instance of the $(p,q)$-Flexible Graph Connectivity problem, denoted $(p,q)$-FGC, we have an undirected connected graph $G = (V,E)$, a partition of $E$ into a set of safe edges $S$ and a set of unsafe edges $U$, and nonnegative costs $c: E\to\Re$ on the edges. A subset $F \subseteq E$ of edges is feasible for the $(p,q)$-FGC problem if for any subset $F'$ of unsafe edges with $|F'|\leq q$, the subgraph $(V, F \setminus F')$ is $p$-edge connected. The algorithmic goal is to find a feasible solution $F$ that minimizes $c(F) = \sum_{e \in F} c_e$. We present a simple $2$-approximation algorithm for the $(1,1)$-FGC problem via a reduction to the minimum-cost rooted $2$-arborescence problem. This improves on the $2.527$-approximation algorithm of Adjiashvili et al. Our $2$-approximation algorithm for the $(1,1)$-FGC problem extends to a $(k+1)$-approximation algorithm for the $(1,k)$-FGC problem. We present a $4$-approximation algorithm for the $(p,1)$-FGC problem, and an $O(q\log|V|)$-approximation algorithm for the $(p,q)$-FGC problem. Finally, we improve on the result of Adjiashvili et al. for the unweighted $(1,1)$-FGC problem by presenting a $16/11$-approximation algorithm. The $(p,q)$-FGC problem is related to the well-known Capacitated $k$-Connected Subgraph problem (denoted Cap-k-ECSS) that arises in the area of Capacitated Network Design. We give a $\min(k,2 u_{max})$-approximation algorithm for the Cap-k-ECSS problem, where $u_{max}$ denotes the maximum capacity of an edge.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sylvia Boyd, Joseph Cheriyan, Arash Haddadan, Sharat Ibrahimpur. 2022-02-27. Approximation Algorithms for Flexible Graph Connectivity. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.13298

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS