arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2202.13188

Regularized Bilinear Discriminant Analysis for Multivariate Time Series Data

Jianhua Zhao·Haiye Liang·Shulan Li·Zhiji Yang·Zhen Wang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In recent years, the methods on matrix-based or bilinear discriminant analysis (BLDA) have received much attention. Despite their advantages, it has been reported that the traditional vector-based regularized LDA (RLDA) is still quite competitive and could outperform BLDA on some benchmark datasets. Nevertheless, it is also noted that this finding is mainly limited to image data. In this paper, we propose regularized BLDA (RBLDA) and further explore the comparison between RLDA and RBLDA on another type of matrix data, namely multivariate time series (MTS). Unlike image data, MTS typically consists of multiple variables measured at different time points. Although many methods for MTS data classification exist within the literature, there is relatively little work in exploring the matrix data structure of MTS data. Moreover, the existing BLDA can not be performed when one of its within-class matrices is singular. To address the two problems, we propose RBLDA for MTS data classification, where each of the two within-class matrices is regularized via one parameter. We develop an efficient implementation of RBLDA and an efficient model selection algorithm with which the cross validation procedure for RBLDA can be performed efficiently. Experiments on a number of real MTS data sets are conducted to evaluate the proposed algorithm and compare RBLDA with several closely related methods, including RLDA and BLDA. The results reveal that RBLDA achieves the best overall recognition performance and the proposed model selection algorithm is efficient; Moreover, RBLDA can produce better visualization of MTS data than RLDA.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGstat.ML

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jianhua Zhao, Haiye Liang, Shulan Li, Zhiji Yang, Zhen Wang. 2022-02-26. Regularized Bilinear Discriminant Analysis for Multivariate Time Series Data. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119872

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗