Evaluating forecasts for high-impact events using transformed kernel scores

Sam Allen; David Ginsbourger; Johanna Ziegel

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2202.12732

Evaluating forecasts for high-impact events using transformed kernel scores

Sam Allen·David Ginsbourger·Johanna Ziegel

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

It is informative to evaluate a forecaster's ability to predict outcomes that have a large impact on the forecast user. Although weighted scoring rules have become a well-established tool to achieve this, such scores have been studied almost exclusively in the univariate case, with interest typically placed on extreme events. However, a large impact may also result from events not considered to be extreme from a statistical perspective: the interaction of several moderate events could also generate a high impact. Compound weather events provide a good example of this. To assess forecasts made for high-impact events, this work extends existing results on weighted scoring rules by introducing weighted multivariate scores. To do so, we utilise kernel scores. We demonstrate that the threshold-weighted continuous ranked probability score (twCRPS), arguably the most well-known weighted scoring rule, is a kernel score. This result leads to a convenient representation of the twCRPS when the forecast is an ensemble, and also permits a generalisation that can be employed with alternative kernels, allowing us to introduce, for example, a threshold-weighted energy score and threshold-weighted variogram score. To illustrate the additional information that these weighted multivariate scoring rules provide, results are presented for a case study in which the weighted scores are used to evaluate daily precipitation accumulation forecasts, with particular interest on events that could lead to flooding.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Sam Allen, David Ginsbourger, Johanna Ziegel. 2022-02-25. Evaluating forecasts for high-impact events using transformed kernel scores. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.12732

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗