arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2202.06853

Agent-Based Model Framework for the North Carolina Modeling Infectious Diseases Program (NC MInD ABM) Overview, Design Concepts, and Details Protocol

Kasey Jones·Emily Hadley·Caroline Kery·Alexander Preiss·Marie C. D. Stoner·Sarah Rhea
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

To help facilitate a variety of simulations related to healthcare facilities in North Carolina, we have developed an agent-based model (ABM) to accurately simulate patient (i.e., agent) movement to and from these facilities. This is an Overview, Design Concepts, and Details (ODD) Protocol, a standardized method for describing ABMs. This ODD provides detailed information on healthcare facilities in North Carolina, the agent movement to and between them, and any decisions that were made during the creation of this model. This ABM is intended to be used alongside disease-specific submodels. It can be used for purposes such as simulating the success of interventions on reducing disease transmission, simulating strain on facility resources (including staff and materials), and forecasting hospital capacity. Disease-specific ODDs should accompany this document. No details related to any submodels that use this ABM as a base model are included.

Explore related subjects

stat.APcs.AI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Kasey Jones, Emily Hadley, Caroline Kery, Alexander Preiss, Marie C. D. Stoner, Sarah Rhea. 2022-02-25. Agent-Based Model Framework for the North Carolina Modeling Infectious Diseases Program (NC MInD ABM) Overview, Design Concepts, and Details Protocol. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.06853

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.AI subjectstat.AP subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Optimal Adversarial Testing: Extracting Honest Test Results from Dishonest Test Takers

In applications, it is often required to test objects or people to determine their qualities in terms of certain metrics. However, besides being naturally noisy, the test results can be corrupted by adversarial behaviors of objects or people being tested (test takers). For example, dishonest test takers can cheat in the exams to distort the test results. With the development of AI technologies, such distortions driven by cheating using AI technologies are becoming more commonplace and severe. In this paper, we propose optimal testing strategies which can still recover needed test results even if there are cheaters polluting the results. The proposed testing strategies will optimally re-test selected group of test takers using different testing security measures. We determine the optimal testing strategies using a dynamic programming method.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Distributed Lag Neural Additive Models

We introduce Distributed Lag Neural Additive Models (DLNAMs), neural-additive analogues of Distributed Lag Non-linear Models (DLNMs) for learning nonlinear effects distributed over lags. DLNAMs replace a prespecified spline cross-basis with neural components that learn exposure--lag response surfaces, avoiding choices of basis family, dimension, and knot placement while preserving additive interpretability and familiar distributed-lag summaries. Exp-centered input layers, smooth activations, and learned subnetwork mixtures produce smooth, locally adaptive representations; pointwise uncertainty combines a conditional last-layer Laplace approximation with between-member ensemble variation. In simulations, DLNAMs generally outperformed DLNM comparators, including penalized and treed variants, in recovering known response functions, with lower bias, stronger boundary recovery, and better-calibrated cumulative intervals; gains were largest for more demanding functions. The architecture performed consistently across sample sizes, outcome families, lag horizons, and jointly fitted multi-exposure settings, retaining recovery performance as exposures were added; fit-specific changes were largely confined to optimization, and applications recovered established empirical patterns.

stat.ML↗
arXiv2026

Event-Aligned Analysis of Multi-Rater Pain Assessments Using Continuous Wearable Physiology

Pain is assessed differently by patients, nurses, and clinicians, yet most computational approaches assume a single ground-truth label - effectively ignoring who is doing the rating. We introduce a rater-aware, event-aligned framework that converts sparse, rater-specific pain ratings into discrete pain-change events and aligns continuous wearable physiological signals to these events, preserving rater identity throughout. Applied to multimodal wearable data collected during spine-related pain procedures, the framework identifies substantial disagreement across rater groups and provides preliminary, exploratory evidence of rater-dependent physiological differences preceding reported pain increases. These findings suggest that pain-physiology relationships may not be rater-invariant, and that aggregating assessments across raters may mask meaningful physiological patterns. A rater-aware, event-aligned perspective is therefore a promising direction for interpreting wearable data in real-world clinical pain assessment.

stat.AP↗