arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2201.01958

SQUAD: Combining Sketching and Sampling Is Better than Either for Per-item Quantile Estimation

Abstract

Stream monitoring is fundamental in many data stream applications, such as financial data trackers, security, anomaly detection, and load balancing. In that respect, quantiles are of particular interest, as they often capture the user's utility. For example, if a video connection has high tail latency, the perceived quality will suffer, even if the average and median latencies are low. In this work, we consider the problem of approximating the per-item quantiles. Elements in our stream are (ID, latency) tuples, and we wish to track the latency quantiles for each ID. Existing quantile sketches are designed for a single number stream (e.g., containing just the latency). While one could allocate a separate sketch instance for each ID, this may require an infeasible amount of memory. Instead, we consider tracking the quantiles for the heavy hitters (most frequent items), which are often considered particularly important, without knowing them beforehand. We first present a simple sampling algorithm that serves as a benchmark. Then, we design an algorithm that augments a quantile sketch within each entry of a heavy hitter algorithm, resulting in similar space complexity but with a deterministic error guarantee. Finally, we present SQUAD, a method that combines sampling and sketching while improving the asymptotic space complexity. Intuitively, SQUAD uses a background sampling process to capture the behaviour of the latencies of an item before it is allocated with a sketch, thereby allowing us to use fewer samples and sketches. Our solutions are rigorously analyzed, and we demonstrate the superiority of our approach using extensive simulations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Rana Shahout, Roy Friedman, Ran Ben Basat. 2022-01-06. SQUAD: Combining Sketching and Sampling Is Better than Either for Per-item Quantile Estimation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.01958

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS