arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2112.14870

Registration-free localization of defects in 3-D parts from mesh metrology data using functional maps

Abstract

Spectral Laplacian methods, widely used in computer graphics and manifold learning, have been recently proposed for the Statistical Process Control (SPC) of a sequence of manufactured parts, whose 3-dimensional metrology is acquired with non-contact sensors. These techniques provide an {\em intrinsic} solution to the SPC problem, that is, a solution exclusively based on measurements on the scanned surfaces or 2-manifolds without making reference to their ambient space. These methods, therefore, avoid the computationally expensive, non-convex registration step needed to align the parts, as required by previous methods for SPC based on 3-dimensional measurements. Once a SPC mechanism triggers and out-of-control alarm, however, an additional problem remains: that of locating where on the surface of the part that triggered the SPC alarm there is a significant shape difference with respect to either an in-control part or its nominal (CAD) design. In the past, only registration-based solutions existed for this problem. In this paper, we present a new registration-free solution to the part localization problem. Our approach uses a functional map between the manifolds to be compared, that is, a map between functions defined on each manifold based on intrinsic differential operators, in particular, the Laplace-Beltrami operator, in order to construct a point to point mapping between the two manifolds and be able to locate defects on the suspected part. A recursive partitioning algorithm is presented to define a region of interest on the surface of the part where defects are likely to occur, which results in considerable computational advantages. The functional map method involves a very large number of point-to-point comparisons based on noisy measurements, and a statistical thresholding method is presented to filter the false positives in the underlying massive multiple comparisons problem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Xueqi Zhao, Enrique del Castillo. 2021-12-30. Registration-free localization of defects in 3-D parts from mesh metrology data using functional maps. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.14870

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME