arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2111.11256

Drewnowski's index to measure lifespan variation: Revisiting the Gini coefficient of the life table

José Manuel Aburto·Ugofilippo Basellini·Annette Baudisch·Francisco Villavicencio
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Gini coefficient of the life table is a concentration index that provides information on lifespan variation. Originally proposed by economists to measure income and wealth inequalities, it has been widely used in population studies to investigate variation in ages at death. We focus on a complementary indicator, Drewnowski's index, which is as a measure of equality. We study its mathematical properties and analyze how changes over time relate to changes in life expectancy. Further, we identify the threshold age below which mortality improvements are translated into decreasing lifespan variation and above which these improvements translate into increasing lifespan inequality. We illustrate our theoretical findings simulating scenarios of mortality improvement in the Gompertz model. Our experiments demonstrate how Drewnowski's index can serve as an indicator of the shape of mortality patterns. These properties, along with our analytical findings, support studying lifespan variation alongside life expectancy trends in multiple species.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.PEecon.GNq-fin.ECstat.AP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

José Manuel Aburto, Ugofilippo Basellini, Annette Baudisch, Francisco Villavicencio. 2021-11-19. Drewnowski's index to measure lifespan variation: Revisiting the Gini coefficient of the life table. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2022.08.003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Competition drives excessive recruitment in collective search

Groups that search collectively often exploit what they find by recruiting: one member directs others to a site it has found. Recruitment raises the number of members foraging at a known site, but the return per forager may fall as that number grows, so there is an intermediate optimal recruitment rate. In addition, a site may be used by more than one group. Here we analyze a model of two groups that forage from a single site whose return declines with the total number of foragers present. The two groups interact only through this shared return. The long-run outcome is either coexistence at the foraging site or monopoly by one group, and we analyze the boundary between these two outcomes. A group's best response to its rival is not monotone: it increases its own recruitment rate with the rival's recruitment rate in an attempt to preserve a monopoly, and then its recruitment rate drops discontinuously when it is no longer optimal to preserve a monopoly. We analyze how model parameters govern this shift: a group relinquishes monopoly when the site saturates at few foragers and when the rival group is small. When the two groups have comparable size there are multiple Nash equilibria, so either group may end up with the larger share. And when two equally matched groups compete, both recruit above the rate that maximizes their common return, so that each individual ends with less than it would in a single undivided group of the same total size.

q-bio.PE↗
arXiv2026

Population-scale Ancestral Recombination Graphs with tskit 1.0

Ancestral recombination graphs (ARGs) are an increasingly important component of population and statistical genetics. The tskit library has become key infrastructure for the field, providing an expressive and general representation of ARGs together with a suite of efficient fundamental operations. In this note, we announce tskit version 1.0, describe its underlying rationale, and document its stability guarantees. These guarantees provide a foundation for durable computational artefacts and support long-term reproducibility of code and analyses.

q-bio.PE↗
arXiv2026

Global geometry of the genotype-phenotype map illuminates a trade-off between penetrance and mutational adaptability

Evolution in changing environments requires both reliable expression of the currently favored phenotype, as quantified by penetrance, and the capacity to reach alternative phenotypes through mutation. Previous studies suggest that high penetrance may restrict such mutational access. However, because these studies focus on evolved genotypes and local mutational neighborhoods, they cannot determine whether this local constraint limits mutational adaptability under environmental change. Such adaptability depends on a genotype's position relative to high-fitness regions for other environments. Addressing this question requires reconstructing the full probability distribution over phenotypes for every genotype and the resulting environment-specific fitness landscapes across genotype space. Such reconstruction is generally infeasible because genotype and phenotype spaces grow combinatorially. Here, an abstract model of stochastic genotype-phenotype mapping, inspired by interacting spins in statistical physics, permits exhaustive reconstruction of the map. We find that high-penetrance genotypes tend to occupy the interior of environment-specific high-fitness regions and are mutationally robust, whereas lower-penetrance genotypes tend to lie near their boundaries and have greater mutational access to high-fitness regions for alternative environments. This global geometry generates a trade-off between penetrance and mutational adaptability. In evolutionary simulations, stronger phenotypic noise in a fixed environment increases the selective advantage of reliable expression, thereby favoring high penetrance and mutational robustness. Frequent environmental change instead favors mutational accessibility at the expense of penetrance. Thus, penetrance and adaptability are opposing consequences of the same global geometry, with environmental conditions determining their evolutionary balance.

q-bio.PE↗