arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2111.10784

Why Synthetic Control estimators are biased and what to do about it: Introducing Relaxed and Penalized Synthetic Controls

Abstract

This paper extends the literature on the theoretical properties of synthetic controls to the case of non-linear generative models, showing that the synthetic control estimator is generally biased in such settings. I derive a lower bound for the bias, showing that the only component of it that is affected by the choice of synthetic control is the weighted sum of pairwise differences between the treated unit and the untreated units in the synthetic control. To address this bias, I propose a novel synthetic control estimator that allows for a constant difference of the synthetic control to the treated unit in the pre-treatment period, and that penalizes the pairwise discrepancies. Allowing for a constant offset makes the model more flexible, thus creating a larger set of potential synthetic controls, and the penalization term allows for the selection of the potential solution that will minimize bias. I study the properties of this estimator and propose a data-driven process for parameterizing the penalization term.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Oscar Engelbrektson. 2021-11-21. Why Synthetic Control estimators are biased and what to do about it: Introducing Relaxed and Penalized Synthetic Controls. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.10784

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM