arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2111.09043

ORSA: Outlier Robust Stacked Aggregation for Best- and Worst-Case Approximations of Ensemble Systems\

Abstract

In recent years, the usage of ensemble learning in applications has grown significantly due to increasing computational power allowing the training of large ensembles in reasonable time frames. Many applications, e.g., malware detection, face recognition, or financial decision-making, use a finite set of learning algorithms and do aggregate them in a way that a better predictive performance is obtained than any other of the individual learning algorithms. In the field of Post-Silicon Validation for semiconductor devices (PSV), data sets are typically provided that consist of various devices like, e.g., chips of different manufacturing lines. In PSV, the task is to approximate the underlying function of the data with multiple learning algorithms, each trained on a device-specific subset, instead of improving the performance of arbitrary classifiers on the entire data set. Furthermore, the expectation is that an unknown number of subsets describe functions showing very different characteristics. Corresponding ensemble members, which are called outliers, can heavily influence the approximation. Our method aims to find a suitable approximation that is robust to outliers and represents the best or worst case in a way that will apply to as many types as possible. A 'soft-max' or 'soft-min' function is used in place of a maximum or minimum operator. A Neural Network (NN) is trained to learn this 'soft-function' in a two-stage process. First, we select a subset of ensemble members that is representative of the best or worst case. Second, we combine these members and define a weighting that uses the properties of the Local Outlier Factor (LOF) to increase the influence of non-outliers and to decrease outliers. The weighting ensures robustness to outliers and makes sure that approximations are suitable for most types.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Peter Domanski, Dirk Pflüger, Jochen Rivoir, Raphaël Latty. 2021-11-17. ORSA: Outlier Robust Stacked Aggregation for Best- and Worst-Case Approximations of Ensemble Systems\. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.09043

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG