arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2111.06299

Approximating Sparsest Cut in Low-Treewidth Graphs via Combinatorial Diameter

Abstract

The fundamental sparsest cut problem takes as input a graph $G$ together with the edge costs and demands, and seeks a cut that minimizes the ratio between the costs and demands across the cuts. For $n$-node graphs~$G$ of treewidth~$k$, \chlamtac, Krauthgamer, and Raghavendra (APPROX 2010) presented an algorithm that yields a factor-$2^{2^k}$ approximation in time $2^{O(k)} \cdot \operatorname{poly}(n)$. Later, Gupta, Talwar and Witmer (STOC 2013) showed how to obtain a $2$-approximation algorithm with a blown-up run time of $n^{O(k)}$. An intriguing open question is whether one can simultaneously achieve the best out of the aforementioned results, that is, a factor-$2$ approximation in time $2^{O(k)} \cdot \operatorname{poly}(n)$. In this paper, we make significant progress towards this goal, via the following results: (i) A factor-$O(k^2)$ approximation that runs in time $2^{O(k)} \cdot \operatorname{poly}(n)$, directly improving the work of Chlamt\'a\v{c} et al. while keeping the run time single-exponential in $k$. (ii) For any $\varepsilon>0$, a factor-$O(1/\varepsilon^2)$ approximation whose run time is $2^{O(k^{1+\varepsilon}/\varepsilon)} \cdot \operatorname{poly}(n)$, implying a constant-factor approximation whose run time is nearly single-exponential in $k$ and a factor-$O(\log^2 k)$ approximation in time $k^{O(k)} \cdot \operatorname{poly}(n)$. Key to these results is a new measure of a tree decomposition that we call combinatorial diameter, which may be of independent interest.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Parinya Chalermsook, Matthias Kaul, Matthias Mnich, Joachim Spoerhase, Sumedha Uniyal, Daniel Vaz. 2021-11-11. Approximating Sparsest Cut in Low-Treewidth Graphs via Combinatorial Diameter. https://doi.org/10.1145/3632623

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS