arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2111.06224

Occupational Income Inequality of Thailand: A Case Study of Exploratory Data Analysis beyond Gini Coefficient

Abstract

Income inequality is an important issue that has to be solved in order to make progress in our society. The study of income inequality is well received through the Gini coefficient, which is used to measure degrees of inequality in general. While this method is effective in several aspects, the Gini coefficient alone inevitably overlooks minority subpopulations (e.g. occupations) which results in missing undetected patterns of inequality in minority. In this study, the surveys of incomes and occupations from more than 12 millions households across Thailand have been analyzed by using both Gini coefficient and network densities of income domination networks to get insight regarding the degrees of general and occupational income inequality issues. The results show that, in agricultural provinces, there are less issues in both types of inequality (low Gini coefficients and network densities), while some non-agricultural provinces face an issue of occupational income inequality (high network densities) without any symptom of general income inequality (low Gini coefficients). Moreover, the results also illustrate the gaps of income inequality using estimation statistics, which not only support whether income inequality exists, but that we are also able to tell the magnitudes of income gaps among occupations. These results cannot be obtained via Gini coefficients alone. This work serves as a use case of analyzing income inequality from both general population and subpopulations perspectives that can be utilized in studies of other countries.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wanetha Sudswong, Anon Plangprasopchok, Chainarong Amornbunchornvej. 2021-11-05. Occupational Income Inequality of Thailand: A Case Study of Exploratory Data Analysis beyond Gini Coefficient. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-025-01474-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN