arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2110.05746

Improved Analysis of EDCS via Gallai-Edmonds Decomposition

Soheil Behnezhad
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this note, we revisit the edge-degree constrained subgraph (EDCS) introduced by Bernstein and Stein (ICALP'15). An EDCS is a sparse subgraph satisfying simple edge-degree constraints that is guaranteed to include an (almost) $\frac{2}{3}$-approximate matching of the base graph. Since its introduction, the EDCS has been successfully applied to numerous models of computation. Motivated by this success, we revisit EDCS and present an improved bound for its key property in general graphs. Our main result is a new proof of the approximation guarantee of EDCS that builds on the graph's Gallai-Edmonds decomposition, avoiding the probabilistic method of the previous proofs. As a result, we get that to obtain a $(\frac{2}{3} - \epsilon)$-approximation, a sparse EDCS with maximum degree bounded by $O(1/\epsilon)$ is sufficient. This improves the $O(\log(1/\epsilon)/\epsilon^2)$ bound of Assadi and Bernstein (SOSA'19) and the $O(1/\epsilon^3)$ bound of Bernstein and Stein (SODA'16). Our guarantee essentially matches what was previously only known for bipartite graphs, thereby removing the gap in our understanding of EDCS in general vs. bipartite graphs.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Soheil Behnezhad. 2021-10-12. Improved Analysis of EDCS via Gallai-Edmonds Decomposition. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.05746

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗