arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2110.04574

A Faster Algorithm for Max Cut in Dense Graphs

Arijit Ghosh·Gopinath Mishra·Rahul Raychaudhury·Sayantan Sen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We design an algorithm for approximating the size of \emph{Max Cut} in dense graphs. Given a proximity parameter $\varepsilon \in (0,1)$, our algorithm approximates the size of \emph{Max Cut} of a graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, within an additive error of $\varepsilon n^2$, with sample complexity $\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{\varepsilon^3} \log^2 \frac{1}{\varepsilon} \log \log \frac{1}{\varepsilon})$ and query complexity of $\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{\varepsilon^4} \log^3 \frac{1}{\varepsilon} \log \log \frac{1}{\varepsilon})$. Since Goldreich, Goldwasser and Ron (JACM 98) gave the first algorithm with sample complexity $\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{\varepsilon^5}\log \frac{1}{\varepsilon})$ and query complexity of $\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{\varepsilon^7}\log^2 \frac{1}{\varepsilon})$, there have been several efforts employing techniques from diverse areas with a focus on improving the sample and query complexities. Our work makes the first improvement in the sample complexity as well as query complexity after more than a decade from the previous best results of Alon, Vega, Kannan and Karpinski (JCSS 03) and of Mathieu and Schudy (SODA 08) respectively, both with sample complexity $\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{{\varepsilon}^4}{\log}\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)$. We also want to note that the best time complexity of this problem was by Alon, Vega, Karpinski and Kannan (JCSS 03). By combining their result with an approximation technique by Arora, Karger and Karpinski (STOC 95), they obtained an algorithm with time complexity of $2^{\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{{\varepsilon}^2} \log \frac{1}{\varepsilon})}$. In this work, we have improved this further to $2^{\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} \log \frac{1}{\varepsilon} )}$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Arijit Ghosh, Gopinath Mishra, Rahul Raychaudhury, Sayantan Sen. 2021-10-09. A Faster Algorithm for Max Cut in Dense Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.04574

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗