arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2110.02730

Tight bounds for counting colorings and connected edge sets parameterized by cutwidth

Carla Groenland·Jesper Nederlof·Isja Mannens·Krisztina Szilágyi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the fine-grained complexity of counting the number of colorings and connected spanning edge sets parameterized by the cutwidth and treewidth of the graph. While decompositions of small treewidth decompose the graph with small vertex separators, decompositions with small cutwidth decompose the graph with small \emph{edge} separators. Let $p,q \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $p$ is a prime and $q \geq 3$. - If $p$ divides $q-1$, there is a $(q-1)^{\text{ctw}}n^{O(1)}$ time algorithm for counting list $q$-colorings modulo $p$ of $n$-vertex graphs of cutwidth $\text{ctw}$ and for all $\varepsilon>0$ there is no algorithm running in time $(q-1-\varepsilon)^{\text{ctw}} n^{O(1)}$, assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). - If $p$ does not divide $q-1$, there is a (folklore) $q^{\text{ctw}}n^{O(1)}$ time algorithm for counting list $q$-colorings modulo $p$ of $n$-vertex graphs of cutwidth $\text{ctw}$ and for all $\varepsilon>0$ there is no algorithm running in time $(q-\varepsilon)^{\text{ctw}} n^{O(1)}$, assuming SETH. The lower bounds are in stark contrast with the existing $2^{\text{ctw}}n^{O(1)}$ time algorithm to compute the chromatic number of a graph by Jansen and Nederlof~[Theor. Comput. Sci.'18]. Both our algorithms and lower bounds employ use of the matrix rank method, by relating the complexity of the problem to the rank of a certain `compatibility matrix' in a non-trivial way. We extend our lower bounds to counting connected spanning edge sets modulo $p$ and give an algorithm with matching running time for both treewidth and cutwidth.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.CC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Carla Groenland, Jesper Nederlof, Isja Mannens, Krisztina Szilágyi. 2021-10-06. Tight bounds for counting colorings and connected edge sets parameterized by cutwidth. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02730

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗