arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv · 2110.02290

Error metric for non-trace-preserving quantum operations

Abstract

We study the problem of measuring errors in non-trace-preserving quantum operations, with a focus on their impact on quantum computing. We propose an error metric that efficiently provides an upper bound on the trace distance between the normalized output states from imperfect and ideal operations, while remaining compatible with the diamond distance. As a demonstration of its application, we apply our metric in the analysis of a lossy beam splitter and a nondeterministic conditional sign-flip gate, two primary non-trace-preserving operations in the Knill-Laflamme-Milburn protocol. We then turn to the leakage errors of neutral-atom quantum computers, finding that these errors scale worse than previously anticipated, implying a more stringent fault-tolerant threshold. We also assess the quantum Zeno gate's error using our metric. In a broader context, we discuss the potential of our metric to analyze general postselected protocols, where it can be employed to study error propagation and estimate thresholds in fault-tolerant quantum computing. The results highlight the critical role of our proposed error metric in understanding and addressing challenges in practical quantum information processing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yu Shi, Edo Waks. 2023-10-08. Error metric for non-trace-preserving quantum operations. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.108.032609

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quantum probability for statisticians; some new ideas

It is argued from several points of view that quantum probabilities might play a role in statistical settings. New approaches toward quantum foundations have postulates that appear to be equally valid in macroscopic settings. One such approach is described here in detail, while one other is briefly sketched. In particular, arguments behind the Born rule, which gives the basis for quantum probabilities, are given. A list of ideas for possible statistical applications of quantum probabilities is provided and discussed. A particular area is machine learning, where there exists substantial literature on links to quantum probability. Here, an idea about model reduction is sketched and is motivated from a quantum probability model. Quantum models can play a role in model reduction, where the partial least squares regression model is a special case. It is shown that for certain experiments, a Bayesian prior given by a quantum probability can be motivated. Quantum decision theory is an emerging discipline that can be motivated by this author's theory of quantum foundations.

quant-ph↗

Black hole/quantum machine learning correspondence

We explore a possible connection between the black hole information paradox and interpolation geometry underlying the double descent phenomenon in quantum machine learning. State-dependent operator reconstruction on the Hawking radiation can be formulated as a quantum linear inverse problem defined on the black hole-radiation purification. In this picture, the Page time corresponds to the interpolation threshold, where the dimensions of the remaining black hole and the radiation become comparable. Using the Marchenko-Pastur law, we study the spectrum of the corresponding Gram matrices and obtain the variance of the linear reconstruction coefficients. The Page point is then related to both a change in the rank structure of the two subsystems and a strong enhancement of the coefficient variance near the interpolation threshold. This suggests a possible relation between the Page transition and interpolation phenomena in quantum machine learning.

quant-ph↗

Intersubjective Agreement about Measurement Outcomes Is Unnecessary in QBism

The thought experiment called ``Wigner's Friend" has experienced a renewal of interest for interrogating the meaning of intersubjectivity and objectivity in quantum mechanics. These new inquiries extend to investigations at the intersection of phenomenology and QBism. Philosopher of physics Steven French argues that QBism does not give assurances that Wigner and friend must agree on the same quantum state or measurement outcomes. In this article, we draw on Wigner's Friend to argue that an external guarantee for agreement on either quantum states or measurement outcomes is unnecessary. We defend the view that the quantum formalism is already inherently intersubjective in the way required to sustain objectivity. Here we explore the QBist notion of reciprocity, which treats Wigner and friend as physical systems taking mutual actions on each other. The QBist notion of reciprocity leads to a sharper characterization of what it means to objectify quantum systems with the formalism. Drawing on phenomenological resources, we argue that state assignments for quantum systems, including those for Wigner and friend, are a form of objectification. To assign a quantum state is to objectify a phenomenon as a quantum system, to treat something as the sort of object to which the formalism applies. Our argument accounts for why the quantum formalism does not radically change in application for different systems because the systems themselves exceed their formalization.

quant-ph↗