arXiv · 2110.01429
Thru-Hole Epitaxy: Is Remote Epitaxy Really Remote?
Abstract
The remote epitaxy was originally proposed to grow a film, which is not in contact but crystallographically aligned with a substrate and easily detachable due to a van der Waals material as a space layer. Here we show that the claimed remote epitaxy is more likely to be nonremote `thru-hole' epitaxy. On a substrate with thick and symmetrically incompatible van der Waals space layer or even with a three-dimensional amorphous oxide film in-between, we demonstratively grew GaN domains through thru-holes via connectedness-initiated epitaxial lateral overgrowth, not only readily detachable but also crystallographically aligned with a substrate. Our proposed nonremote thru-hole epitaxy, which is embarrassingly straightforward and undemanding, can provide wider applicability of the benefits known to be only available by the claimed remote epitaxy.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Dongsoo Jang, Chulwoo Ahn, Youngjun Lee, Seungjun Lee, Hyunkyu Lee, Donghoi Kim, Young-Kyun Kwon, Jaewu Choi, Chinkyo Kim. 2021-10-04. Thru-Hole Epitaxy: Is Remote Epitaxy Really Remote?. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202201406
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.