arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2109.15078

Infinitesimal gauge transformations induced by Lie algebroid connections, in the context of Yang-Mills-Higgs gauge theory

Abstract

There is the notion of action Lie algebroids, containing information about Lie algebras and their actions, which is why it is natural to generalise gauge theories to a formulation using Lie algebroids; these allow structure functions in general. This is for example done in the formulation of curved Yang-Mills-Higgs gauge theory, formulated by Alexei Kotov and Thomas Strobl. We will discuss how to formulate infinitesimal gauge transformations using Lie algebroids in such a way that these close as algebra. For this we are going to generalise infinitesimal gauge transformations of Yang-Mills-Higgs gauge theories to derivations on vector bundle $V$-valued functionals. In the context of gauge theory, we will motivate that those vector bundles $V$ will be the pullback of another bundle $W$, and the gauge transformations as derivations will be induced by a Lie algebroid connection on $W$, using a more general notion of pullback connections. This also supports the usage of arbitrary types of connections on $W$ in the definition of the infinitesimal gauge transformation, not just canonical flat ones as in the classical formulation. As usual, these derivations are parametrised and their parameters have to be generalised to functionals, especially the parameters themselves can have a non-trivial gauge transformation. We then discuss under which conditions this algebra of derivations gives a closed algebra, also by providing a natural Lie bracket on the space of parameters, and we are going to see that closure is strongly related to the vanishing of a tensor known as the basic curvature.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Simon-Raphael Fischer. 2021-09-30. Infinitesimal gauge transformations induced by Lie algebroid connections, in the context of Yang-Mills-Higgs gauge theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.15078

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph