arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2108.13707

Wild Bootstrap for Instrumental Variables Regressions with Weak and Few Clusters

Abstract

We study the wild bootstrap inference for instrumental variable regressions in the framework of a small number of large clusters in which the number of clusters is viewed as fixed and the number of observations for each cluster diverges to infinity. We first show that the wild bootstrap Wald test, with or without using the cluster-robust covariance estimator, controls size asymptotically up to a small error as long as the parameters of endogenous variables are strongly identified in at least one of the clusters. Then, we establish the required number of strong clusters for the test to have power against local alternatives. We further develop a wild bootstrap Anderson-Rubin test for the full-vector inference and show that it controls size asymptotically up to a small error even under weak or partial identification in all clusters. We illustrate the good finite sample performance of the new inference methods using simulations and provide an empirical application to a well-known dataset about US local labor markets.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Wenjie Wang, Yichong Zhang. 2021-08-31. Wild Bootstrap for Instrumental Variables Regressions with Weak and Few Clusters. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.13707

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM