arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2108.08909

A Simple Approach to the Tiling Problem Using Recursive Sequence

Abstract

The tiling problem has been a famous problem that has appeared in many Mathematics problems. Many of its solutions are rooted in high-level Mathematics. Thus we hope to tackle this problem using more elementary Mathematics concepts. In this report, we start with the simplest cases, with the smaller numbers: the number of ways to tile a $2 \times n$, $3 \times n$, $4 \times n$ rectangular board using $2 \times 1$ domino tiles, where the number of rows is fixed and we present a recursive formula based on $m$ and the earlier terms. This allows us to deduce the non-recursive formula for each case that is only dependent on $m$. For each case, we also expand and generalize the problem, not just for $2$, $3$, $4$ but for any positive integer $k$, for certain types of configurations of the board. We also focus on one of the famous variations of the tiling problem: tatami tiling, and present a solution for simple cases: $2 \times n$, $3 \times n$, $4 \times n$. In the end, we have managed to find a simpler solution for three different configurations of the board, with some we even deduced the non-recursive formula. We have also solved simple cases of the tatami tiling problem, with the hope to tackle the general case in the future. We realized that our method only works on a case-by-case basis, with little success in solving the general case. This approach is also applicable in many other counting problems which we wish to pursue for further research.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Le Viet Hung, Tan Yiming, Huang Keyi, Jin Qingyang. 2021-08-18. A Simple Approach to the Tiling Problem Using Recursive Sequence. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.08909

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Come for the vibe, stay for the math

This article describes our experiences in mathematical outreach over the past decade. We talk about specific activities, but also general principles that we've learned along the way.

math.HO

Graduate Mathematics in the Age of AI: Forming Mathematicians for Original, Independent, and Responsible Inquiry

Artificial intelligence can increasingly produce plausible, sophisticated mathematical material faster than a developing graduate student can understand or verify it. A sophisticated result or paper draft therefore becomes weaker evidence of the student's own mathematical development. This creates a formation gap between output and personal capacity, and a trust gap between a convincing argument and warranted acceptance. The formation gap can persist even when the student understands the output: understanding a supplied argument does not by itself establish the capacity to initiate and direct inquiry. These gaps are not the whole story. AI can also help students explore examples, compare approaches, enter unfamiliar areas, and undertake ambitious research. The task is to design an apprenticeship that realizes these possibilities while developing substantive mathematical command. The central purpose of a mathematics PhD is to form mathematicians capable of original, independent, and responsible inquiry, including inquiry conducted with AI. This document develops that objective through four connected capacities: competence, judgment, independence, and responsibility. It distinguishes a work's contribution to mathematics from the evidence it provides of a student's formation; explains how a known answer can initiate rather than end creative inquiry; and proposes changes in learning activities, assessment, doctoral originality, advising, and institutional support. Purposeful independent work and ambitious AI-assisted research are complementary parts of the model. Its recommendations include proportionate contribution statements, recognition of advising costs, and staged pilots evaluating both mathematical ability and effective human--AI collaboration. The aim is not to preserve an inherited sequence of training, but to improve mathematical formation as mathematical practice changes.

math.HO