arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2107.08292

Anti Tai Mapping for Unordered Labeled Trees

Abstract

The well-studied Tai mapping between two rooted labeled trees $T_1(V_1, E_1)$ and $T_2(V_2, E_2)$ defines a one-to-one mapping between nodes in $T_1$ and $T_2$ that preserves ancestor relationship. For unordered trees the problem of finding a maximum-weight Tai mapping is known to be NP-complete. In this work, we define an anti Tai mapping $M\subseteq V_1\times V_2$ as a binary relation between two unordered labeled trees such that any two $(x,y), (x', y')\in M$ violate ancestor relationship and thus cannot be part of the same Tai mapping, i.e. $(x\le x' \iff y\not \le y') \vee (x'\le x \iff y'\not \le y)$, given an ancestor order $x<x'$ meaning that $x$ is an ancestor of $x'$. Finding a maximum-weight anti Tai mapping arises in the cutting plane method for solving the maximum-weight Tai mapping problem via integer programming. We give an efficient polynomial-time algorithm for finding a maximum-weight anti Tai mapping for the case when one of the two trees is a path and further show how to extend this result in order to provide a polynomially computable lower bound on the optimal anti Tai mapping for two unordered labeled trees. The latter result stems from the special class of anti Tai mapping defined by the more restricted condition $x\sim x' \iff y\not\sim y'$, where $\sim$ denotes that two nodes belong to the same root-to-leaf path. For this class, we give an efficient algorithm that solves the problem directly on two unordered trees in $O(|V_1|^2|V_2|^2)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mislav Blažević, Stefan Canzar, Khaled Elbassioni, Domagoj Matijević. 2021-07-17. Anti Tai Mapping for Unordered Labeled Trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.08292

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS