arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2106.04629

New Competitive Semi-online Scheduling Algorithms for Small Number of Identical Machines

Debasis Dwibedy·Rakesh Mohanty
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Design and analysis of constant competitive deterministic semi-online algorithms for the multi-processor scheduling problem with small number of identical machines have gained significant research interest in the last two decades. In the semi-online scheduling problem for makespan minimization, we are given a sequence of independent jobs one by one in order and upon arrival, each job must be allocated to a machine with prior knowledge of some Extra Piece of Information (EPI) about the future jobs. Researchers have designed multiple variants of semi-online scheduling algorithms with constant competitive ratios by considering one or more EPI. In this paper, we propose four new variants of competitive deterministic semi-online algorithms for smaller number of identical machines by considering two EPI such as Decr and Sum. We obtain improved upper bound and lower bound results on the competitive ratio for our proposed algorithms, which are comparable to the best known results in the literature. In two identical machines setting with known Sum, we show a tight bound of 1.33 on the competitive ratio by considering a sequence of equal size jobs. In the same setting we achieve a lower bound of 1.04 and an upper bound of 1.16 by considering Sum and a sequence of jobs arriving in order of decreasing sizes. For three identical machines setting with known Decr and Sum, we show a lower bound of 1.11 on the competitive ratio. In this setting, we obtain an upper bound of 1.5 for scheduling a sequence of equal size jobs and achieves an upper bound of 1.2 by considering a sequence of decreasing size jobs. Further we develop an improved competitive algorithm with an upper bound of 1.11 on the competitive ratio.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Debasis Dwibedy, Rakesh Mohanty. 2021-06-08. New Competitive Semi-online Scheduling Algorithms for Small Number of Identical Machines. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.04629

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗