arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2105.14695

Halt Properties and Complexity Evaluations for Optimal DeepLLL Algorithm Families

Takuto Odagawa·Koji Nuida
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

DeepLLL algorithm (Schnorr, 1994) is a famous variant of LLL lattice basis reduction algorithm, and PotLLL algorithm (Fontein et al., 2014) and $S^2$LLL algorithm (Yasuda and Yamaguchi, 2019) are recent polynomial-time variants of DeepLLL algorithm developed from cryptographic applications. However, the known polynomial bounds for computational complexity are shown only for parameter $\delta < 1$; for "optimal" parameter $\delta = 1$ which ensures the best output quality, no polynomial bounds are known, and except for LLL algorithm, it is even not formally proved that the algorithm always halts within finitely many steps. In this paper, we prove that these four algorithms always halt also with optimal parameter $\delta = 1$, and furthermore give explicit upper bounds for the numbers of loops executed during the algorithms. Unlike the known bound (Akhavi, 2003) applicable to LLL algorithm only, our upper bounds are deduced in a unified way for all of the four algorithms.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.CR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Takuto Odagawa, Koji Nuida. 2021-05-31. Halt Properties and Complexity Evaluations for Optimal DeepLLL Algorithm Families. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.14695

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗