High-dimensional Change-point Detection Using Generalized Homogeneity Metrics

Shubhadeep Chakraborty; Runmin Wang; Xianyang Zhang

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2105.08976

High-dimensional Change-point Detection Using Generalized Homogeneity Metrics

Shubhadeep Chakraborty·Runmin Wang·Xianyang Zhang

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Change-point detection is a classical problem in statistics. We address the problem of detecting abrupt changes in the data-generating distributions of a sequence of high-dimensional observations beyond the first two moments. This problem remains less explored, especially in the high-dimensional context, compared to detecting changes in the mean or the covariance structure. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first attempts to detect and localize general types of distributional changes in the high-dimensional regime. We develop a distance-based method to (i) test for the existence of a change-point, and (ii) identify the change-point locations in an independent sequence of high-dimensional observations. Our approach rests upon recent distance-based tests for the homogeneity of two high-dimensional distributions. We construct a single change-point test statistic based on a cumulative sum process in an embedded Hilbert space and rigorously derive its limiting null distribution and prove asymptotic consistency under the high-dimensional medium sample size (HDMSS) framework. Subsequently, we combine our statistics with the Narrowest-Over-Threshold (NOT) strategy to recursively estimate and test for multiple change-point locations. We also study a componentwise monotone-invariant, rank-based extension; because its pseudo-observations are pooled empirical mid-ranks and are therefore dependent, we present this version as a practically useful heuristic extension supported by simulation evidence rather than as a fully proved analogue of the original statistic. The superior performance of our methodology compared to existing procedures is illustrated via extensive simulation studies and an application to U.S. stock return data during the global financial crisis. The proposed method is implemented in the R package KDist, available at https://github.com/zhangxiany-tamu/KDist.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Shubhadeep Chakraborty, Runmin Wang, Xianyang Zhang. 2021-05-19. High-dimensional Change-point Detection Using Generalized Homogeneity Metrics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.08976

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗