Finding Triangles or Independent Sets; and Other Dual Pair Approximations

Adrian Dumitrescu

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2105.01265

Finding Triangles or Independent Sets; and Other Dual Pair Approximations

Adrian Dumitrescu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We revisit the algorithmic problem of finding a triangle in a graph (\textsc{Triangle Detection}), and examine its relation to other problems such as \textsc{3Sum}, \textsc{Independent Set}, and \textsc{Graph Coloring}. We obtain several new algorithms: \smallskip (I) A simple randomized algorithm for finding a triangle in a graph. As an application, we study the range of a conjecture of P\v{a}tra\c{s}cu (2010) regarding the triangle detection problem. \smallskip (II) An algorithm which given a graph $G=(V,E)$ performs one of the following tasks in $O(m+n)$ (ie, linear) time: (i)~compute a $\Omega(1/\sqrt{n})$-approximation of a maximum independent set in $G$ or (ii)~find a triangle in $G$. The run-time is faster than that for any previous method for each of these tasks. \smallskip (III) An algorithm which given a graph $G=(V,E)$ performs one of the following tasks in $O(m+n^{3/2})$ time: (i)~compute an $\sqrt{n}$-approximation for \textsc{Graph Coloring} of $G$ or (ii)~find a triangle in $G$. The run-time is faster than that for any previous method for each of these tasks on dense graphs, with $m =\omega(n^{9/8})$. \smallskip (IV) The second and third results suggest the following broader research direction: if it is difficult to find (A) or (B) separately, can one find one of the two efficiently? This motivates the \emph{dual pair} concept we introduce. We discuss and provide several instances of dual-pair approximation.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Adrian Dumitrescu. 2021-05-04. Finding Triangles or Independent Sets; and Other Dual Pair Approximations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.01265

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗