arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2104.14301

The Effect of Marketing Investment on Firm Value and Systematic Risk

Abstract

Analyzing the financial benefit of marketing is still a critical topic for both practitioners and researchers. Companies consider marketing costs as a type of investment and expect this investment to be returned to the company in the form of profit. On the other hand, companies adopt different innovative strategies to increase their value. Therefore, this study aims to test the impact of marketing investment on firm value and systematic risk. To do so, data related to four Arabic emerging markets during the period 2010-2019 are considered, and firm share price and beta share are considered to measure firm value and systematic risk, respectively. Since a firm's ownership concentration is a determinant factor in firm value and systematic risk, this variable is considered a moderated variable in the relationship between marketing investment and firm value and systematic risk. The findings of the study, using panel data regression, indicate that increasing investment in marketing has a positive effect on the firm value valuation model. It is also found that the ownership concentration variable has a reinforcing role in the relationship between marketing investment and firm value. It is also disclosed that it moderates the systematic risk aligned with the monitoring impact of controlling shareholders. This study provides a logical combination of governance-marketing dimensions to interpret performance indicators in the capital market.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Musaab Mousa, Saeed Nosratabadi, Judit Sagi, Amir Mosavi. 2021-04-29. The Effect of Marketing Investment on Firm Value and Systematic Risk. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010064

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Tracks to Modernity: Railroads, Growth, and Social Movements in Denmark

We examine how railroads shaped Denmark's nineteenth-century economic transformation and the diffusion of Grundtvigian institutions. Using a panel of 1589 parishes and a difference-in-differences design for staggered adoption, we find that railroad connection increased local population by 7 percent, partly through internal in-migration, and structural change. Railroad access also brought cultural and institutional change by increasing the local densities of folk high schools and community houses, though these results are less robust than the economic findings.

econ.GN

Revisiting Hötte (2025): A Companion Analysis with Extended Evidence from UK Inter-Industry Payment Data, 2017-2024

In 2025, the UK Office for National Statistics released a novel dataset of monthly inter-industry payment flows during January 2017 to November 2024 at the 5-digit SIC level (ONS, 2025a), covering $>$3.1 million UK organizations. Annual aggregates amount to 490 million transactions with an aggregate value of over £3.1 trillion in 2023. Such publicly available data are unprecedented by their granularity and timeliness, providing a rich basis for economic research and real-time policy advice. Hötte (2025) provided an empirical validation supplemented with conceptual discussions for using such bottom-up collected data in macroeconomic, industry-level, and economic network studies based on an earlier non-public and smaller version of the data. The novel data features much greater coverage, along with several methodological improvements. This paper gives an update on the earlier empirical results. It summarizes the major methodological changes of data construction, discusses key empirical observations, and their differences and consistencies relative to Hötte (2025). It concludes by discussing the implications for using payment data and outlining remaining challenges and expected future developments.

econ.GN

Reconstructing Large Scale Production Networks

Firm-to-firm production networks matter for aggregate propagation, but they are rarely observed. This paper reconstructs national-scale, weighted firm-to-firm networks from two public objects: a sectoral input--output table and the distribution of firm sizes by sector. The algorithm first draws a binary buyer-seller backbone from a sector-aware gravity model and then assigns weights by a minimum-energy program. A Markov closure makes the reconstructed network primitive, so it has a unique stationary distribution. The weighting program keeps one-step firm balances and sectoral flows close to the data; the stationary money vector is then checked ex post and remains close in aggregate. For the United States we reconstruct a network with about 6.5 million firms and 340 million links in roughly four hours on a single workstation. We also reconstruct the networks of Japan, the United Kingdom, Australia, Finland, and Denmark. The Japanese reconstruction, built without any link data, reproduces the heavy-tailed degree regime documented in the country's observed production network. The reconstructed networks exhibit customer tails heavier than supplier tails, though the algorithm treats the two sides symmetrically. We also run computational experiments on the reconstructed networks to assess the systemic risk posed by the failure of individual firms. These experiments show that neither firm size nor degree nor sectoral position is a good proxy for the aggregate losses generated by a firm's failure. For such questions, there is no good substitute for the complete weighted buyer-seller network that we reconstruct. We release the reconstruction code, the generated networks, a Python library, and a graphical

econ.GN