arXiv · 2103.11909
Identifying Machine-Paraphrased Plagiarism
Abstract
Employing paraphrasing tools to conceal plagiarized text is a severe threat to academic integrity. To enable the detection of machine-paraphrased text, we evaluate the effectiveness of five pre-trained word embedding models combined with machine-learning classifiers and eight state-of-the-art neural language models. We analyzed preprints of research papers, graduation theses, and Wikipedia articles, which we paraphrased using different configurations of the tools SpinBot and SpinnerChief. The best-performing technique, Longformer, achieved an average F1 score of 81.0% (F1=99.7% for SpinBot and F1=71.6% for SpinnerChief cases), while human evaluators achieved F1=78.4% for SpinBot and F1=65.6% for SpinnerChief cases. We show that the automated classification alleviates shortcomings of widely-used text-matching systems, such as Turnitin and PlagScan. To facilitate future research, all data, code, and two web applications showcasing our contributions are openly available at https://github.com/jpwahle/iconf22-paraphrase.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Jan Philip Wahle, Terry Ruas, Tomáš Foltýnek, Norman Meuschke, Bela Gipp. 2021-03-22. Identifying Machine-Paraphrased Plagiarism. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96957-8_34
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.