arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2103.09362

On Linear Solution of "Cherry Pickup II". Max Weight of Two Disjoint Paths in Node-Weighted Gridlike DAG

Igor N. Tunev
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

"Minimum Falling Path Sum" (MFPS) is classic question in programming - "Given a grid of size $N{\times}N$ with integers in cells, return the minimum sum of a falling path through grid. A falling path starts at any cell in the first row and ends in last row, with the rule of motion - the next element after the cell $(i,j)$ is one of the cells $(i+1,j-1),(i+1,j)$ and $(i+1,j+1)$". This problem has linear solution (LS) (i.e. O($N^2$)) using dynamic programming method (DPM). There is an Multi-Agent version of MFPS called "Cherry Pickup II" (CP2). CP2 is a search for the maximum sum of 2 falling paths started from top corners, where each covered cell summed up one time. All known fast solutions of CP2 uses DPM, but have O($N^3$) time complexity on grid $N{\times}N$. Here we offer a LS of CP2 (also using DPM) as finding maximum total weight of 2 vertex-disjoint paths. Also, we extend this LS for some extended version of CP2 with wider motion rules.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Igor N. Tunev. 2021-03-16. On Linear Solution of "Cherry Pickup II". Max Weight of Two Disjoint Paths in Node-Weighted Gridlike DAG. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.09362

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗