Optimal Streaming Algorithms for Graph Matching

Jianer Chen; Qin Huang; Iyad Kanj; Ge Xia

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2102.06939

Optimal Streaming Algorithms for Graph Matching

Jianer Chen·Qin Huang·Iyad Kanj·Ge Xia

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present parameterized streaming algorithms for the graph matching problem in both the dynamic and the insert-only models. For the dynamic streaming model, we present a one-pass algorithm that, with high probability, computes a maximum-weight $k$-matching of a weighted graph in $\tilde{O}(Wk^2)$ space and that has $\tilde{O}(1)$ update time, where $W$ is the number of distinct edge weights and the notation $\tilde{O}()$ hides a poly-logarithmic factor in the input size. For the insert-only streaming model, we present a one-pass algorithm that runs in $O(k^2)$ space and has $O(1)$ update time, and that, with high probability, computes a maximum-weight $k$-matching of a weighted graph. The space complexity and the update-time complexity achieved by our algorithms for unweighted $k$-matching in the dynamic model and for weighted $k$-matching in the insert-only model are optimal. A notable contribution of this paper is that the presented algorithms {\it do not} rely on the apriori knowledge/promise that the cardinality of \emph{every} maximum-weight matching of the input graph is upper bounded by the parameter $k$. This promise has been a critical condition in previous works, and lifting it required the development of new tools and techniques.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.CC

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Jianer Chen, Qin Huang, Iyad Kanj, Ge Xia. 2021-02-13. Optimal Streaming Algorithms for Graph Matching. https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.06939

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗