arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2102.06547

Like Attract Like? A Structural Comparison of Homogamy across Same-Sex and Different-Sex Households

Edoardo Ciscato·Alfred Galichon·Marion Goussé
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we extend Gary Becker's empirical analysis of the marriage market to same-sex couples. Becker's theory rationalizes the well-known phenomenon of homogamy among different-sex couples: individuals mate with their likes because many characteristics, such as education, consumption behaviour, desire to nurture children, religion, etc., exhibit strong complementarities in the household production function. However, because of asymmetries in the distributions of male and female characteristics, men and women may need to marry "up" or "down" according to the relative shortage of their characteristics among the populations of men and women. Yet, among same-sex couples, this limitation does not exist as partners are drawn from the same population, and thus the theory of assortative mating would boldly predict that individuals will choose a partner with nearly identical characteristics. Empirical evidence suggests a very different picture: a robust stylized fact is that the correlation of the characteristics is in fact weaker among same-sex couples. In this paper, we build an equilibrium model of same-sex marriage market which allows for straightforward identification of the gains to marriage. We estimate the model with 2008-2012 ACS data on California and show that positive assortative mating is weaker for homosexuals than for heterosexuals with respect to age and race. Our results suggest that positive assortative mating with respect to education is stronger among lesbians, and not significantly different when comparing gay men and married different-sex couples. As regards labor market outcomes, such as hourly wages and working hours, we find some indications that the process of specialization within the household mainly applies to different-sex couples.

Explore related subjects

econ.GNq-fin.EC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Edoardo Ciscato, Alfred Galichon, Marion Goussé. 2021-02-12. Like Attract Like? A Structural Comparison of Homogamy across Same-Sex and Different-Sex Households. https://doi.org/10.1086/704611

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Understanding the Mechanism of Altruism in Large Language Models

Altruism is fundamental to human societies, fostering cooperation and social cohesion. While recent studies suggest that large language models (LLMs) can display human-like prosocial behavior, the underlying mechanism that produces such behavior remains unclear. We leverage sparse autoencoders (SAEs) to identify a set of features that contribute to an LLM's altruistic choices in the Dictator Game. We show that intervening on these features substantially shifts the model's allocations and produces similar effects in several other social decision scenarios. Together, these results link the model's prosocial output to internal features that can be identified and causally manipulated, providing a transparent approach to studying the computational basis of decision-making in LLMs.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Bystander on the Fence: Sanctions in a Multipolar World

We provide a theory of optimal trade sanctions with three strategic players: Home (sanctioner), Foreign (target), and Bystander. Bystander may act unilaterally or ally with either party subject to a participation constraint. We derive three novel results. First, members of a coalition generically set different tariffs either under Stackelberg timing or when transfers are imperfect. Second, as sanctions tighten, Home's welfare can improve even beyond the unilateral terms-of-trade optimum due to strategic interactions. Third, we characterize feasible sanctions targets when Home and Foreign compete for Bystander's support. An alternative implementation arises with competition: Home lets Foreign win, but Foreign's transfer to Bystander implements the sanctions target. We apply our model to sanctions against Russian crude. In a calibration exercise, cooperation among India, China, and Russia best matches observed data. Sanctions could have been roughly 70% more effective had China and India acted unilaterally or had the sanctioning coalition made them a better offer.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Which Text Matters: Handling Model Uncertainty in Text-as-Data Regressions, with an Application to Central Bank Communication

Social scientists routinely convert text into covariates like topic shares, ideal points or sentiment scores, and insert them into statistical models of interest. This two-step design is convenient, but it is rarely guided by theory: little tells the analyst which text-based covariates to construct or include. Each approach embodies contestable measurement choices, and competing operationalizations of the same construct can support different conclusions, so a single research question gives rise to a menu of competing regression models. Which text constructed covariates belong in a model, and in what functional form, is thus a problem of model uncertainty. We propose spike-and-slab generalized additive models (SSGAMs), which jointly select covariates and determine whether their effects are linear or nonlinear. We illustrate the approach with the communication of a powerful unelected institution, asking which of 45 competing text indicators from 224 monthly European Central Bank press conferences, spanning late 2002 to mid-2025, track professional inflation expectations. A sparse set is selected; widely used alternatives, and every tested nonlinear effect, carry no incremental information.

econ.GN↗