arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2101.07550

Upper Dominating Set: Tight Algorithms for Pathwidth and Sub-Exponential Approximation

Louis Dublois·Michael Lampis·Vangelis Th. Paschos
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

An upper dominating set is a minimal dominating set in a graph. In the \textsc{Upper Dominating Set} problem, the goal is to find an upper dominating set of maximum size. We study the complexity of parameterized algorithms for \textsc{Upper Dominating Set}, as well as its sub-exponential approximation. First, we prove that, under ETH, \textsc{$k$-Upper Dominating Set} cannot be solved in time $O(n^{o(k)})$ (improving on $O(n^{o(\sqrt{k})})$), and in the same time we show under the same complexity assumption that for any constant ratio $r$ and any $\varepsilon > 0$, there is no $r$-approximation algorithm running in time $O(n^{k^{1-\varepsilon}})$. Then, we settle the problem's complexity parameterized by pathwidth by giving an algorithm running in time $O^*(6^{pw})$ (improving the current best $O^*(7^{pw})$), and a lower bound showing that our algorithm is the best we can get under the SETH. Furthermore, we obtain a simple sub-exponential approximation algorithm for this problem: an algorithm that produces an $r$-approximation in time $n^{O(n/r)}$, for any desired approximation ratio $r < n$. We finally show that this time-approximation trade-off is tight, up to an arbitrarily small constant in the second exponent: under the randomized ETH, and for any ratio $r > 1$ and $\varepsilon > 0$, no algorithm can output an $r$-approximation in time $n^{(n/r)^{1-\varepsilon}}$. Hence, we completely characterize the approximability of the problem in sub-exponential time.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.CC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Louis Dublois, Michael Lampis, Vangelis Th. Paschos. 2021-01-19. Upper Dominating Set: Tight Algorithms for Pathwidth and Sub-Exponential Approximation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.07550

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗