arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2101.02806

Handling Neumann and Robin boundary conditions in a fictitious domain volume penalization framework

Ramakrishnan Thirumalaisamy·Neelesh A. Patankar·Amneet Pal Singh Bhalla
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Sakurai et al. (J Comput Phys, 2019) presented a flux-based volume penalization (VP) approach for imposing inhomogeneous Neumann boundary conditions on embedded interfaces. The flux-based VP method modifies the diffusion coefficient of the original elliptic (Poisson) equation and uses a flux-forcing function as a source term in the equation to impose the Neumann boundary conditions. As such, the flux-based VP method can be easily incorporated into existing fictitious domain codes. Sakurai et al. relied on an analytical construction of flux-forcing functions, which limits the practicality of the approach. Because of the analytical approach taken in the prior work, only (spatially) constant flux values on simple interfaces were considered. In this paper, we present a numerical technique for constructing flux-forcing functions for arbitrarily complex boundaries. The imposed flux values are also allowed to vary spatially in our approach. Furthermore, the flux-based VP method is extended to include (spatially varying) Robin boundary conditions, which makes the flux-based VP method even more general. We consider several two- and three-dimensional test examples to access the spatial accuracy of the numerical solutions. The method is also used to simulate flux-driven thermal convection in a concentric annular domain. We formally derive the flux-based volume penalized Poisson equation satisfying Neumann/Robin boundary condition in strong form; such a derivation was not presented in Sakurai et al., where the equation first appeared for the Neumann problem. The derivation reveals that the flux-based VP approach relies on a surface delta function to impose inhomogeneous Neumann/Robin boundary conditions. However, explicit construction of the delta function is not necessary for the flux-based VP method, which makes it different from other diffuse domain equations presented in the literature.

Explore related subjects

math.NAcs.NA

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ramakrishnan Thirumalaisamy, Neelesh A. Patankar, Amneet Pal Singh Bhalla. 2021-01-08. Handling Neumann and Robin boundary conditions in a fictitious domain volume penalization framework. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110726

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Stress-divergence, Laplacian, and rotational forms of the incompressible Navier--Stokes equations with variable viscosity

In the Navier--Stokes equations, incompressibility allows rewriting the viscous term in various forms leading to distinct numerical properties and flow descriptions. Furthermore, models accounting for non-Newtonian, thermal or turbulent effects often break the constant-viscosity assumption, thereby producing additional consistency terms. In this context, the present work compares the classical symmetric-gradient diffusion term with more recent variable-viscosity generalizations of the Laplacian and rotational forms. We discuss, analyze and test their differences with respect to implementation, efficiency, numerical stability and outflow boundary conditions. With a focus on time-dependent flows, we consider second-order implicit-explicit (IMEX) temporal discretizations aimed at improving efficiency and numerical stability. Through a rigorous stability analysis, we show how selected explicit treatments can bypass algorithmic nonlinearities without inducing CFL conditions. Our numerical results highlight important differences between the three viscous formulations---especially in the presence of outflow boundaries, for which the generalized Laplacian form proves more suitable in diffusion-dominated regimes. %(as widely known for constant viscosity).

math.NA↗
arXiv2026

Full-window branch discovery and loss-selected EnKF continuation for data assimilation

We develop a framework for offline full-window branch discovery, optionally followed by online continuation with an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF). Three mechanisms drive the branch search: adjoint path-kernel (APK) differentiation balances kernel differentiation and correction-stabilized path perturbation, shifting the optimization from exploration to exploitation; an optimized Gaussian initial law broadens the search over initial-state basins; and loss-weighted mixing across independent runs recombines successful path components. We may then select an interior state using a local loss and continue online with an EnKF. In 40-dimensional Lorenz-96 experiments, the mean offline path RMSE of APK is 4.3 times smaller than that of population weak-$\mathrm{4D\text{-}Var}_x$. The resulting APK-EnKF method has a mean online RMSE 64 times smaller than that of ordinary EnKF.

math.NA↗
arXiv2026

A variational physics-informed graph neural network for heterogeneous solid mechanics

Stress localization in heterogeneous solids is governed by the bimaterial interface, where the displacement field remains $C^0$-continuous, while in-plane stresses jump due to the stiffness mismatch. Coordinate-based physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) represent this jump via a prescribed regularization width or a weighted interface penalty, making their accuracy sensitive to how phase-contrast changes are handled. This work presents a variational, label-free physics-informed graph neural network (PI-GNN) in which the heterogeneity is carried by the discretization rather than by the trial field. The solver operates on a conforming adaptive mesh graph, assigns constitutive behavior per element, and minimizes the discrete total potential energy as a single unweighted objective in which only first derivatives appear. The discrete energy on piecewise-linear elements coincides with the finite element (FE) Ritz functional. Dirichlet conditions are enforced by construction, with no penalty term, no interface weight, and no prescribed transition width. Using one fixed architecture, optimizer, and loss across small-strain elasticity and finite-strain Neo-Hookean hyperelasticity in two and three dimensions, the von Mises error remains below $3.58\%$ across a stiffness-contrast sweep spanning $(E_{\mathrm{inc}}/E_{\mathrm{mat}}\in[10^{-2},10^{2}])$, where a strong-form PINN degrades to $5.58\%$, and its displacement error reaches $7.66\%$ against $0.49\%$ for the PI-GNN. A trained network halves the ($\sigma_{xx}$) error of an energy-based PINN ($5.01\%$ versus $10.94\%$). Training cost exceeds a single FE solve by more than an order of magnitude, so the construction is a variationally consistent, penalty-free interface representation for parametric surrogates and inverse identification rather than a replacement for a one-off FE analysis.

math.NA↗