arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2012.01937

On spike-and-slab priors for Bayesian equation discovery of nonlinear dynamical systems via sparse linear regression

Abstract

This paper presents the use of spike-and-slab (SS) priors for discovering governing differential equations of motion of nonlinear structural dynamic systems. The problem of discovering governing equations is cast as that of selecting relevant variables from a predetermined dictionary of basis variables and solved via sparse Bayesian linear regression. The SS priors, which belong to a class of discrete-mixture priors and are known for their strong sparsifying (or shrinkage) properties, are employed to induce sparse solutions and select relevant variables. Three different variants of SS priors are explored for performing Bayesian equation discovery. As the posteriors with SS priors are analytically intractable, a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)-based Gibbs sampler is employed for drawing posterior samples of the model parameters; the posterior samples are used for variable selection and parameter estimation in equation discovery. The proposed algorithm has been applied to four systems of engineering interest, which include a baseline linear system, and systems with cubic stiffness, quadratic viscous damping, and Coulomb damping. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the SS priors in identifying the presence and type of nonlinearity in the system. Additionally, comparisons with the Relevance Vector Machine (RVM) - that uses a Student's-t prior - indicate that the SS priors can achieve better model selection consistency, reduce false discoveries, and derive models that have superior predictive accuracy. Finally, the Silverbox experimental benchmark is used to validate the proposed methodology.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Rajdip Nayek, Ramon Fuentes, Keith Worden, Elizabeth J. Cross. 2020-12-03. On spike-and-slab priors for Bayesian equation discovery of nonlinear dynamical systems via sparse linear regression. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107986

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME