arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2012.00673

Modified Dorfman procedure for pool tests with dilution -- COVID-19 case study

Andrzej Jaszkiewicz
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The outbreak of the global COVID-19 pandemic results in unprecedented demand for fast and efficient testing of large numbers of patients for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. Beside technical improvements of the cost and speed of individual tests, pool testing may be used to improve efficiency and throughput of a population test. Dorfman pool testing procedure is one of the best known and studied methods of this kind. This procedure is, however, based on unrealistic assumptions that the pool test has perfect sensitivity and the only objective is to minimize the number of tests, and is not well adapted to the case of imperfect pool tests. We propose and analyze a simple modification of this procedure in which test of a pool with negative result is independently repeated up to several times. The proposed procedure is evaluated in a computational study using recent data about dilution effect for SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests, showing that the proposed approach significantly reduces the number of false negatives with a relatively small increase of the number of tests, especially for small prevalence rates. For example, for prevalence rate 0.001 the number of tests could be reduced to 22.1% of individual tests, increasing the expected number of false negatives by no more than 1%, and to 16.8% of individual tests increasing the expected number of false negatives by no more than 10%. At the same time, a similar reduction of the expected number of tests in the standard Dorfman procedure would yield 675% and 821% increase of the expected number of false negatives, respectively. This makes the proposed procedure an interesting choice for screening tests in the case of diseases like COVID-19.

Explore related subjects

stat.MEstat.AP

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Andrzej Jaszkiewicz. 2020-11-30. Modified Dorfman procedure for pool tests with dilution -- COVID-19 case study. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.00673

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗