A $(2+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for preemptive weighted flow time on a single machine

Lars Rohwedder; Andreas Wiese

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2011.05676

A $(2+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for preemptive weighted flow time on a single machine

Lars Rohwedder·Andreas Wiese

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Weighted flow time is a fundamental and very well-studied objective function in scheduling. In this paper, we study the setting of a single machine with preemptions. The input consists of a set of jobs, characterized by their processing times, release times, and weights and we want to compute a (possibly preemptive) schedule for them. The objective is to minimize the sum of the weighted flow times of the jobs, where the flow time of a job is the time between its release date and its completion time. It had been a long-standing open problem to find a polynomial time $O(1)$-approximation algorithm for this setting. In a recent break-through result, Batra, Garg, and Kumar (FOCS 2018) found such an algorithm if the input data are polynomially bounded integers, and Feige, Kulkarni, and Li (SODA 2019) presented a black-box reduction to this setting. The resulting approximation ratio is a (not explicitly stated) constant which is at least $10.000$. In this paper we improve this ratio to $2+\varepsilon$. The algorithm by Batra, Garg, and Kumar (FOCS 2018) reduces the problem to Demand MultiCut on trees and solves the resulting instances via LP-rounding and a dynamic program. Instead, we first reduce the problem to a (different) geometric problem while losing only a factor $1+\epsilon$, and then solve its resulting instances up to a factor of $2+\epsilon$ by a dynamic program. In particular, our reduction ensures certain structural properties, thanks to which we do not need LP-rounding methods. We believe that our result makes substantial progress towards finding a PTAS for weighted flow time on a single machine.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Lars Rohwedder, Andreas Wiese. 2020-11-11. A $(2+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for preemptive weighted flow time on a single machine. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.05676

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗