arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2011.05042

Scheduling Bag-of-Tasks in Clouds using Spot and Burstable Virtual Machines

Luan Teylo·Luciana Arantes·Pierre Sens·Lúcia Maria de A. Drummond
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Leading Cloud providers offer several types of Virtual Machines (VMs) in diverse contract models, with different guarantees in terms of availability and reliability. Among them, the most popular contract models are the on-demand and the spot models. In the former, on-demand VMs are allocated for a fixed cost per time unit, and their availability is ensured during the whole execution. On the other hand, in the spot market, VMs are offered with a huge discount when compared to the on-demand VMs, but their availability fluctuates according to the cloud's current demand that can terminate or hibernate a spot VM at any time. Furthermore, in order to cope with workload variations, cloud providers have also introduced the concept of burstable VMs which are able to burst up their respective baseline CPU performance during a limited period of time with an up to 20% discount when compared to an equivalent non-burstable on-demand VMs. In the current work, we present the Burst Hibernation-Aware Dynamic Scheduler (Burst-HADS), a framework that schedules and executes tasks of Bag-of-Tasks applications with deadline constraints by exploiting spot and on-demand burstable VMs, aiming at minimizing both the monetary cost and the execution time. Based on ILS metaheuristics, Burst-HADS defines an initial scheduling map of tasks to VMs which can then be dynamically altered by migrating tasks of a hibernated spot VM or by performing work-stealing when VMs become idle. Performance results on Amazon EC2 cloud with different applications show that, when compared to a solution that uses only regular on-demand instances, Burst-HADS reduces the monetary cost of the execution and meet the application deadline even in scenarios with high spot hibernation rates. It also reduces the total execution time when compared to a solution that uses only spot and non-burstable on-demand instances.

Explore related subjects

cs.DC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Luan Teylo, Luciana Arantes, Pierre Sens, Lúcia Maria de A. Drummond. 2020-11-10. Scheduling Bag-of-Tasks in Clouds using Spot and Burstable Virtual Machines. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.05042

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Online Treasure Hunt in Vertex-Permuted Dynamic Rings

We study the problem of treasure hunt by a group of $k \geq 1$ agents in vertex-permuted dynamic rings (VP). In this model, the $n$ vertices remain on a ring but are permuted at each time step. We first show that treasure hunt is impossible for any $k \leq n-3$ agents, if there are no restrictions on the sequence of permutations used in the dynamic ring. We then study the $VP(\delta)$ setting, in which for every pair $i, j$ of vertices, the edge $(i, j)$ is guaranteed to appear within $\delta$ steps. We show that the class $VP(\delta)$ is feasible only for $\delta \geq \left\lceil \frac{n-1}{2}\right\rceil$. For the one-agent case, we show a tight bound of $\Theta(\delta n)$ on the worst-case search time as well as competitive ratio of any online algorithm for treasure hunt, provided $\delta \geq 2n$. We then give an optimal algorithm for $k$ agents, thereby showing that $k$ agents can obtain a speedup of $k$ on the worst-case search time. Finally, in the R-VP setting, in which in every step, the vertices are arranged as a ring according to a random permutation, we show that treasure hunt takes expected $\Theta(n)$ steps against an oblivious adversary and $\Theta(n \log n)$ steps against an adaptive adversary.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

The Computing Channel: How Modulation Programs the Airwaves

Distributed computing and distributed artificial intelligence require frequent exchanges of intermediate results, although many applications need only an aggregate rather than messages from individual devices. Conventional systems recover each message before computing the aggregate, whereas over-the-air computation (OAC) exploits simultaneous transmission to obtain it directly. However, dominant OAC implementations rely on analog signaling, creating a mismatch with finite-precision data and digital communication procedures. This article presents digital function-oriented communication, in which finite-alphabet symbol representations and receiver decisions are jointly designed so that multiple-access superposition encodes the desired function without recovering individual inputs. We introduce its computational-constellation principle, main design approaches, extensions, and implementation challenges. Federated edge learning illustrates how the framework can reduce user-dependent data-bearing resources while operating directly on quantized model updates.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

Can AI Remediate Backend Failures Safely? GuardedAct with Blast-Radius-Aware Sandboxing

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising capabilities in generating remediation actions for microservice failures. However, directly executing AI-generated repair actions in production risks cascading collateral damage. We propose GuardedAct, a sandbox-first remediation framework that interposes a blast-radius-aware verification layer between the LLM action generator and the production environment. GuardedAct operates in four phases: (1) ingesting a diagnosis report together with the live system topology and recent telemetry, (2) prompting an LLM to produce a ranked list of candidate remediation actions, (3) simulating each action in a lightweight digital-twin sandbox that estimates the blast radius and assigns a risk label, and (4) enforcing a rollback-confidence gate that auto-executes only low-risk actions while escalating high-risk ones for human review. We evaluate GuardedAct on five fault scenarios injected into the DeathStarBench social-network application. Experimental results show that GuardedAct achieves an overall recovery rate of 87.4% while reducing collateral damage by 79.7% relative to direct LLM execution (from 25.6% to 5.2%), at the cost of a modest sandbox-induced increase in mean time to recovery (approximately 8 s). Ablation studies confirm that each component contributes meaningfully to the safety-speed trade-off.

cs.DC↗