arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2011.04564

Reduced-Rank Regression with Operator Norm Error

Abstract

A common data analysis task is the reduced-rank regression problem: $$\min_{\textrm{rank-}k \ X} \|AX-B\|,$$ where $A \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times c}$ and $B \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$ are given large matrices and $\|\cdot\|$ is some norm. Here the unknown matrix $X \in \mathbb{R}^{c \times d}$ is constrained to be of rank $k$ as it results in a significant parameter reduction of the solution when $c$ and $d$ are large. In the case of Frobenius norm error, there is a standard closed form solution to this problem and a fast algorithm to find a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate solution. However, for the important case of operator norm error, no closed form solution is known and the fastest known algorithms take singular value decomposition time. We give the first randomized algorithms for this problem running in time $$(nnz{(A)} + nnz{(B)} + c^2) \cdot k/\varepsilon^{1.5} + (n+d)k^2/\epsilon + c^{\omega},$$ up to a polylogarithmic factor involving condition numbers, matrix dimensions, and dependence on $1/\varepsilon$. Here $nnz{(M)}$ denotes the number of non-zero entries of a matrix $M$, and $\omega$ is the exponent of matrix multiplication. As both (1) spectral low rank approximation ($A = B$) and (2) linear system solving ($n = c$ and $d = 1$) are special cases, our time cannot be improved by more than a $1/\varepsilon$ factor (up to polylogarithmic factors) without a major breakthrough in linear algebra. Interestingly, known techniques for low rank approximation, such as alternating minimization or sketch-and-solve, provably fail for this problem. Instead, our algorithm uses an existential characterization of a solution, together with Krylov methods, low degree polynomial approximation, and sketching-based preconditioning.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Praneeth Kacham, David P. Woodruff. 2020-11-09. Reduced-Rank Regression with Operator Norm Error. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.04564

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS