arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2011.00650

Search Engine Similarity Analysis: A Combined Content and Rankings Approach

Konstantina Dritsa·Thodoris Sotiropoulos·Haris Skarpetis·Panos Louridas
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

How different are search engines? The search engine wars are a favorite topic of on-line analysts, as two of the biggest companies in the world, Google and Microsoft, battle for prevalence of the web search space. Differences in search engine popularity can be explained by their effectiveness or other factors, such as familiarity with the most popular first engine, peer imitation, or force of habit. In this work we present a thorough analysis of the affinity of the two major search engines, Google and Bing, along with DuckDuckGo, which goes to great lengths to emphasize its privacy-friendly credentials. To do so, we collected search results using a comprehensive set of 300 unique queries for two time periods in 2016 and 2019, and developed a new similarity metric that leverages both the content and the ranking of search responses. We evaluated the characteristics of the metric against other metrics and approaches that have been proposed in the literature, and used it to (1) investigate the similarities of search engine results, (2) the evolution of their affinity over time, (3) what aspects of the results influence similarity, and (4) how the metric differs over different kinds of search services. We found that Google stands apart, but Bing and DuckDuckGo are largely indistinguishable from each other.

Explore related subjects

cs.IRcs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Konstantina Dritsa, Thodoris Sotiropoulos, Haris Skarpetis, Panos Louridas. 2020-11-06. Search Engine Similarity Analysis: A Combined Content and Rankings Approach. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62008-0_2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Cross-Document Neural Re-Ranking via Query-Induced Subgraphs

Neural re-rankers typically score query-document pairs independently, neglecting cross-document context within the retrieved candidate set. We propose Graph Neural Re-Ranking (GNRR), a framework that extracts a sparse, query-induced subgraph from a pre-computed semantic corpus graph and applies Graph Neural Networks (GNN) to propagate cross-document signals. Unlike self-attention re-rankers, which scale quadratically with the number of candidates ($\mathcal{O}(K^2)$), GNRR achieves $\mathcal{O}(c \cdot K)$ online complexity, where $c$ is the fixed corpus graph degree and $K$ the candidate set size. We evaluate five GNN operators within this framework and find that architecture choice substantially affects generalization to harder queries: the GCN variant is the only one that consistently improves over TCT-ColBERT across all three TREC benchmarks. On TREC-DLHard, the most challenging evaluation benchmark, GNRR achieves $+5.2\%$ relative AP over TCT-ColBERT and $+9.0\%$ AP over a self-attention re-ranker. Notably, self-attention re-ranking degrades AP on DLHard ($-3.5\%$ versus TCT-ColBERT), suggesting that sparse corpus-graph structure provides a complementary re-ranking signal that dense self-attention fails to capture. Efficiency analysis shows that GNN models require fewer parameters and lower per-query latency at $K=1000$ than self-attention, with linear rather than quadratic scaling in candidate set size. Code to reproduce our experiment is available at https://github.com/difra100/Graph-Neural-Re-Ranking-via-Corpus-Graph

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

LazFormer: Scaling Transformers for Industrial Recommendation via Transferable Generative Pre-training

Transformers have shown promising performance in LLMs due to their outstanding scalability, several studies have investigated the scalability of Transformers for industrial recommendation. They typically rely on a single ranking model to optimize both sparse and dense parameters from scratch, resulting in substantial computational resource consumption and slow convergence. Fortunately, the pre-training models offer an effective solution to the above issues by providing favorable initialization of both sparse and dense parameters for the subsequent ranking. However, they still face two major limitations: (1) Since the input features used in pre-training and ranking are usually inconsistent, directly transferring dense parameters from pre-training to ranking may lead to negative transfer. (2) Multi-epoch training during the ranking process may result in the overfitting of sparse parameters, while freezing the sparse parameters limits their adaptability to the ranking objectives. To this end, we propose a Scaling Transformer for Industrial Recommendation via Transferable Generative Pre-training, termed LazFormer. Specifically, we first present a generative pre-training module to autoregressively generate sequential features, providing favorable initialization of both sparse and dense parameters for the subsequent ranking. To solve the negative transfer of dense parameters, we propose a transferable residual adapter that injects additional ranking-specific features into ranking in a residual manner. Moreover, a request-aware ranking module integrates long-sequence compression, hybrid sparse attention, and a request-aware paradigm to efficiently model users' long sequences. Besides, we further propose an asymmetric multi-epoch training strategy that resets sparse parameters while continuously accumulating dense parameters across epochs, alleviating the overfitting of sparse parameters.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

Generate to Explore, Select to Exploit: Aligning LLM-based Headline Generation with Personalized Recommendation

In industrial recommendation feeds, presenting a static headline for an item often fails to satisfy the diverse, multimodal interests of the user population, particularly suppressing the needs of long-tail audiences. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have been integrated into recommendation for content understanding or ranking, directly optimizing them to output a single best headline typically leads to mode collapse---converging to generic patterns that satisfy average tastes but miss specific latent intents. To bridge this gap, we introduce GESE (Generate to Explore, Select to Exploit), a framework operating at the system's presentation layer that decouples personalization into generative exploration and selective exploitation. First, we treat the LLM as a probabilistic explorer, utilizing Group Sequence Policy Optimization (GSPO) with a hierarchical reward mechanism to generate a candidate set that maximizes the semantic coverage of potential user interests. Subsequently, a lightweight, real-time feedback-aware selector acts as the exploiter, identifying the optimal realization from the candidate pool based on instant contextual signals. Extensive deployment on a commercial platform with over 100 million daily active users demonstrates that GESE significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving a 2.57% lift in CTR and 0.87% in dwell time. These results validate that decoupling diversity-oriented generation from precision-oriented selection offers a robust blueprint for aligning generative AI with dynamic user utility.

cs.IR↗