arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2009.11840

Complexity of Scheduling Few Types of Jobs on Related and Unrelated Machines

Abstract

The task of scheduling jobs to machines while minimizing the total makespan, the sum of weighted completion times, or a norm of the load vector, are among the oldest and most fundamental tasks in combinatorial optimization. Since all of these problems are in general NP-hard, much attention has been given to the regime where there is only a small number $k$ of job types, but possibly the number of jobs $n$ is large; this is the few job types, high-multiplicity regime. Despite many positive results, the hardness boundary of this regime was not understood until now. We show that makespan minimization on uniformly related machines ($Q|HM|C_{\max}$) is NP-hard already with $6$ job types, and that the related Cutting Stock problem is NP-hard already with $8$ item types. For the more general unrelated machines model ($R|HM|C_{\max}$), we show that if either the largest job size $p_{\max}$, or the number of jobs $n$ are polynomially bounded in the instance size $|I|$, there are algorithms with complexity $|I|^{\textrm{poly}(k)}$. Our main result is that this is unlikely to be improved, because $Q||C_{\max}$ is W[1]-hard parameterized by $k$ already when $n$, $p_{\max}$, and the numbers describing the speeds are polynomial in $|I|$; the same holds for $R|HM|C_{\max}$ (without speeds) when the job sizes matrix has rank $2$. Our positive and negative results also extend to the objectives $\ell_2$-norm minimization of the load vector and, partially, sum of weighted completion times $\sum w_j C_j$. Along the way, we answer affirmatively the question whether makespan minimization on identical machines ($P||C_{\max}$) is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by $k$, extending our understanding of this fundamental problem. Together with our hardness results for $Q||C_{\max}$ this implies that the complexity of $P|HM|C_{\max}$ is the only remaining open case.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Martin Koutecký, Johannes Zink. 2020-09-24. Complexity of Scheduling Few Types of Jobs on Related and Unrelated Machines. https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.11840

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS