arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2008.11285

Cosmology Intertwined III: $f \sigma_8$ and $S_8$

Eleonora Di Valentino·Luis A. Anchordoqui·Ozgur Akarsu·Yacine Ali-Haimoud·Luca Amendola·Nikki Arendse·Marika Asgari·Mario Ballardini·Spyros Basilakos·Elia Battistelli·Micol Benetti·Simon Birrer·François R. Bouchet·Marco Bruni·Erminia Calabrese·David Camarena·Salvatore Capozziello·Angela Chen·Jens Chluba·Anton Chudaykin·Eoin Ó Colgáin·Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine·Paolo de Bernardis·Javier de Cruz Pérez·Jacques Delabrouille·Jo Dunkley·Celia Escamilla-Rivera·Agnès Ferté·Fabio Finelli·Wendy Freedman·Noemi Frusciante·Elena Giusarma·Adrià Gómez-Valent·Will Handley·Ian Harrison·Luke Hart·Alan Heavens·Hendrik Hildebrandt·Daniel Holz·Dragan Huterer·Mikhail M. Ivanov·Shahab Joudaki·Marc Kamionkowski·Tanvi Karwal·Lloyd Knox·Suresh Kumar·Luca Lamagna·Julien Lesgourgues·Matteo Lucca·Valerio Marra·Silvia Masi·Sabino Matarrese·Arindam Mazumdar·Alessandro Melchiorri·Olga Mena·Laura Mersini-Houghton·Vivian Miranda·Cristian Moreno-Pulido·David F. Mota·Jessica Muir·Ankan Mukherjee·Florian Niedermann·Alessio Notari·Rafael C. Nunes·Francesco Pace·Andronikos Paliathanasis·Antonella Palmese·Supriya Pan·Daniela Paoletti·Valeria Pettorino·Francesco Piacentini·Vivian Poulin·Marco Raveri·Adam G. Riess·Vincenzo Salzano·Emmanuel N. Saridakis·Anjan A. Sen·Arman Shafieloo·Anowar J. Shajib·Joseph Silk·Alessandra Silvestri·Martin S. Sloth·Tristan L. Smith·Joan Solà·Carsten van de Bruck·Licia Verde·Luca Visinelli·Benjamin D. Wandelt·Deng Wang·Jian-Min Wang·Anil K. Yadav·Weiqiang Yang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The standard $\Lambda$ Cold Dark Matter cosmological model provides a wonderful fit to current cosmological data, but a few tensions and anomalies became statistically significant with the latest data analyses. While these anomalies could be due to the presence of systematic errors in the experiments, they could also indicate the need for new physics beyond the standard model. In this Letter of Interest we focus on the tension of the Planck data with weak lensing measurements and redshift surveys, about the value of the matter energy density $\Omega_m$, and the amplitude or rate of the growth of structure ($\sigma_8,f\sigma_8$). We list a few interesting models for solving this tension, and we discuss the importance of trying to fit with a single model a full array of data and not just one parameter at a time.

Explore related subjects

astro-ph.COhep-ph

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Eleonora Di Valentino, Luis A. Anchordoqui, Ozgur Akarsu, Yacine Ali-Haimoud, Luca Amendola, Nikki Arendse, Marika Asgari, Mario Ballardini, Spyros Basilakos, Elia Battistelli, Micol Benetti, Simon Birrer, François R. Bouchet, Marco Bruni, Erminia Calabrese, David Camarena, Salvatore Capozziello, Angela Chen, Jens Chluba, Anton Chudaykin, Eoin Ó Colgáin, Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine, Paolo de Bernardis, Javier de Cruz Pérez, Jacques Delabrouille, Jo Dunkley, Celia Escamilla-Rivera, Agnès Ferté, Fabio Finelli, Wendy Freedman, Noemi Frusciante, Elena Giusarma, Adrià Gómez-Valent, Will Handley, Ian Harrison, Luke Hart, Alan Heavens, Hendrik Hildebrandt, Daniel Holz, Dragan Huterer, Mikhail M. Ivanov, Shahab Joudaki, Marc Kamionkowski, Tanvi Karwal, Lloyd Knox, Suresh Kumar, Luca Lamagna, Julien Lesgourgues, Matteo Lucca, Valerio Marra, Silvia Masi, Sabino Matarrese, Arindam Mazumdar, Alessandro Melchiorri, Olga Mena, Laura Mersini-Houghton, Vivian Miranda, Cristian Moreno-Pulido, David F. Mota, Jessica Muir, Ankan Mukherjee, Florian Niedermann, Alessio Notari, Rafael C. Nunes, Francesco Pace, Andronikos Paliathanasis, Antonella Palmese, Supriya Pan, Daniela Paoletti, Valeria Pettorino, Francesco Piacentini, Vivian Poulin, Marco Raveri, Adam G. Riess, Vincenzo Salzano, Emmanuel N. Saridakis, Anjan A. Sen, Arman Shafieloo, Anowar J. Shajib, Joseph Silk, Alessandra Silvestri, Martin S. Sloth, Tristan L. Smith, Joan Solà, Carsten van de Bruck, Licia Verde, Luca Visinelli, Benjamin D. Wandelt, Deng Wang, Jian-Min Wang, Anil K. Yadav, Weiqiang Yang. 2020-08-25. Cosmology Intertwined III: $f \sigma_8$ and $S_8$. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102604

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Constraining spinning primordial black holes with interstellar dust heating

Primordial black holes (PBHs) are a well-motivated dark matter candidate, and their cosmic abundance is constrained by a variety of observational probes. PBHs in the mass range $10^{15}\,\text{g}\,{-}\,10^{17}\,\text{g}$ are evaporating today via Hawking radiation, a process that can heat interstellar dust and modify its thermal emission. Recent studies have used this effect to place constraints on the abundance of non-spinning PBHs. We extend this approach by investigating the influence of PBH spin on dust-heating constraints. Furthermore, we account for secondary photons that originate not only from the decay of gauge bosons but also from the decay of hadrons produced via the fragmentation of primary quarks and gluons emitted through Hawking radiation. By comparing the dust heating rate induced by spinning PBHs with the maximum cooling rate of dust, considering both silicate and graphite grains, we derive new upper limits on the fraction of dark matter in the form of PBHs, $f_{\rm PBH}$. Our results show that the constraints depend on both PBH mass and spin. Smaller PBHs with higher spin yield stronger limits. For example, in the cases we investigated, the strongest constraint is $f_{\rm PBH} \sim 1.5 \times 10^{-4}$ for $M_{\rm PBH} = 10^{15}{\rm g}$ and spin parameter $a_{*} = 0.9999$. Although these limits are less stringent than existing constraints in the same mass range, they provide a distinct and complementary approach to constraining the abundance of PBHs.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2026

Two-parameter continuous deformation of Starobinsky inflation as a bridge between Planck and ACT DESI data with $N_\star\in(50,60)$

We present a family of plateau-type inflationary potentials, eq.~\eqref{Vgeneral}, and analyze a two-parameter $\alpha\beta$-Starobinsky specialization that interpolates continuously between a \emph{maximal} plateau ($V\!\to\!V_0$) and a \emph{submaximal} plateau ($V\!\to\!V_\infty 0$ with $x_\star\gg 1/\beta$ the slow-roll scaling laws change to $n_s\simeq 1-\frac{4}{3N_\star},\, r\simeq\mathcal{C}(\alpha,\beta)\,N_\star^{-4/3},$ with an explicit coefficient $\mathcal{C}(\alpha,\beta)$ set by the plateau truncation. This deformation lifts $n_s$ at fixed $N_\star$ while further suppressing $r$, reconciling the Planck~2018 constraint $n_s=0.9649\pm0.0042$ (68\% CL) and BICEP/Keck18 data $r_{0.05}<0.036$ (95\% CL), with the higher central values $n_s\sim0.97$--$0.98$ preferred by ACT+DESI~DR2 (BAO), within the theoretically motivated interval $N_\star\in(50,60)$ and without exotic reheating. We provide an exact identity for $V/V'$ enabling analytic control of $N_\star$, a practical crossover criterion $\beta\,x_\star\ll1$ vs.\ $\gg1$, and a transparent mapping between $(\alpha,\beta)$ and the observables $(n_s,r,N_\star)$. These yield sharp, testable signatures, particularly the softened $N_\star$-scaling of $r$, that distinguish a maximal from a submaximal plateau with upcoming CMB and LSS data.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2026

A Tale of Two Gauges: Effective Field Theory for Relativistic Behavior of Cosmological Axions

In this work, we present a formalism to model the relativistic behavior of axions. The relativistic behavior of axions is surprisingly difficult to model precisely, as it involves oscillations on timescales much shorter than the Hubble timescale. To overcome this challenge, one typically resorts to some form of effective treatment, focusing only on the time-averaged description of the exact oscillations. Salehian, Namjoo & Kaiser provide a systematic framework for such treatment, based on the effective field theory formalism. While the aforementioned study was formulated for axion perturbations in the Newtonian gauge with no anisotropic stress, we extend the formalism to the synchronous gauge that is more conventionally used for numerical implementation in a realistic cosmological setting. Unlike their work, however, we propose a fluid interpretation in which the axion field can be identified as a perfect fluid at all times, both in the exact and effective regimes. Moreover, we present the effective field theory for the Newtonian gauge with non-zero anisotropic stress, making the original formulation more general and useful for scenarios where the matter content of the universe is multi-component. These results lay the theoretical foundation for a companion paper where we discuss how the axion field should be incorporated alongside other species in common cosmological Boltzmann solvers.

astro-ph.CO↗