arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2007.03933

Linear-Time Algorithms for Computing Twinless Strong Articulation Points and Related Problems

Abstract

A directed graph $G=(V,E)$ is twinless strongly connected if it contains a strongly connected spanning subgraph without any pair of antiparallel (or twin) edges. The twinless strongly connected components (TSCCs) of a directed graph $G$ are its maximal twinless strongly connected subgraphs. These concepts have several diverse applications, such as the design of telecommunication networks and the structural stability of buildings. A vertex $v \in V$ is a twinless strong articulation point of $G$ if the deletion of $v$ increases the number of TSCCs of $G$. Here, we present the first linear-time algorithm that finds all the twinless strong articulation points of a directed graph. We show that the computation of twinless strong articulation points reduces to the following problem in undirected graphs, which may be of independent interest: Given a $2$-vertex-connected (biconnected) undirected graph $H$, find all vertices $v$ that belong to a vertex-edge cut-pair, i.e., for which there exists an edge $e$ such that $H \setminus \{v,e\}$ is not connected. We develop a linear-time algorithm that not only finds all such vertices $v$, but also computes the number of edges $e$ such that $H \setminus \{v,e\}$ is not connected. This also implies that for each twinless strong articulation point $v$ which is not a strong articulation point in a strongly connected digraph $G$, we can compute the number of TSCCs in $G \setminus v$. We note that the problem of computing all vertices that belong to a vertex-edge cut-pair can be solved in linear-time by exploiting the structure of $3$-vertex-connected (triconnected) components of $H$, represented by an SPQR tree of $H$. Our approach, however, is conceptually simple, and thus likely to be more amenable to practical implementations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Loukas Georgiadis, Evangelos Kosinas. 2020-07-08. Linear-Time Algorithms for Computing Twinless Strong Articulation Points and Related Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.03933

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS