arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2007.03069

Outcome-Driven Dynamic Refugee Assignment with Allocation Balancing

Abstract

This study proposes two new dynamic assignment algorithms to match refugees and asylum seekers to geographic localities within a host country. The first, currently implemented in a multi-year randomized control trial in Switzerland, seeks to maximize the average predicted employment level (or any measured outcome of interest) of refugees through a minimum-discord online assignment algorithm. The performance of this algorithm is tested on real refugee resettlement data from both the US and Switzerland, where we find that it is able to achieve near-optimal expected employment compared to the hindsight-optimal solution, and is able to improve upon the status quo procedure by 40-50%. However, pure outcome maximization can result in a periodically imbalanced allocation to the localities over time, leading to implementation difficulties and an undesirable workflow for resettlement resources and agents. To address these problems, the second algorithm balances the goal of improving refugee outcomes with the desire for an even allocation over time. We find that this algorithm can achieve near-perfect balance over time with only a small loss in expected employment compared to the employment-maximizing algorithm. In addition, the allocation balancing algorithm offers a number of ancillary benefits compared to pure outcome maximization, including robustness to unknown arrival flows and greater exploration.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kirk Bansak, Elisabeth Paulson. 2024-05-24. Outcome-Driven Dynamic Refugee Assignment with Allocation Balancing. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.0445

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Operational Impact of Registry size, Cycle length, and Blood Type Distribution in Multi-Registry Kidney Exchange Programs

Kidney exchange programs address donor recipient incompatibility by exchanging donors between incompatible pairs, but single center KEPs often suffer from limited donor pools, which reduce matching efficiency. Multi registry kidney exchange programs offer a promising solution but face challenges, including heterogeneous constraints across registries, cycle-length bounds, and data-sharing limitations. This study uses simulation to compare mKEP allocation against individual registry operation, contrasting unconstrained pooling with two safeguarded mechanisms: a cumulative individual-rationality guarantee and a Shapley value based fair-share mechanism. We examine how registry size, blood-type distribution, cycle-length bounds, and dropout probability affect the size and distribution of achievable gain. Our central finding is that the benefit of joining an mKEP is systematically uneven: under blood group composition asymmetry, the easier-to-match registry gains less than its partner even under both safeguarded mechanisms, and a larger registry gains less than a smaller one when pooled. A registry combining a larger arrival rate with an easier-to-match pool may see its gain under either safeguarded mechanism fall too small to be practically significant, while registries with a higher dropout rate see a larger benefit from pooling. This unevenness concentrates in O-type recipients: an easier-to-match registry sees fewer O-type transplants within itself under pooling, though O-type transplant rates rise system-wide. Tighter cycle-length bounds increase, rather than diminish, the relative transplant-volume benefit of pooling, while match quality is only modestly affected by any factor examined. These results highlight the importance of pairing multi-registry collaboration with a carefully designed, equitable benefit-sharing mechanism to keep participation attractive for all registries involved.

math.OC

A polynomial approximation scheme for nonlinear model reduction by moment matching

We propose a procedure for the numerical approximation of invariance equations arising in the moment matching technique associated with reduced-order modeling of high-dimensional dynamical systems. The Galerkin residual method is employed to find an approximate solution to the invariance equation using a Newton iteration on the coefficients of a monomial basis expansion of the solution. These solutions to the invariance equations can then be used to construct reduced-order models. We assess the ability of the method to solve the invariance PDE system as well as to achieve moment matching and recover the steady-state behaviour of nonlinear systems with state dimension of order 1000 driven by linear and nonlinear signal generators.

math.OC

Computationally Efficient Density-Driven Optimal Control via Analytical KKT Reduction and Contractive MPC

Efficient coordination for collective spatial distribution is a fundamental challenge in multi-agent systems. Prior research on Density-Driven Optimal Control (D2OC) established a framework to match agent trajectories to a desired spatial distribution. However, implementing this as a predictive controller requires solving a large-scale Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) system, whose computational complexity grows cubically with the prediction horizon. To resolve this, we propose an analytical structural reduction that transforms the T-horizon KKT system into a condensed quadratic program (QP). This formulation achieves O(T) linear scalability, significantly reducing the online computational burden compared to conventional O(T^3) approaches. Furthermore, to ensure rigorous convergence in dynamic environments, we incorporate a contractive Lyapunov constraint and prove the Input-to-State Stability (ISS) of the closed-loop system against reference propagation drift. Numerical simulations verify that the proposed method facilitates rapid density coverage with substantial computational speed-up, enabling long-horizon predictive control for large-scale multi-agent swarms.

math.OC