arXiv · 2006.13190
Facing the Hard Problems in FGVC
Abstract
In fine-grained visual categorization (FGVC), there is a near-singular focus in pursuit of attaining state-of-the-art (SOTA) accuracy. This work carefully analyzes the performance of recent SOTA methods, quantitatively, but more importantly, qualitatively. We show that these models universally struggle with certain "hard" images, while also making complementary mistakes. We underscore the importance of such analysis, and demonstrate that combining complementary models can improve accuracy on the popular CUB-200 dataset by over 5%. In addition to detailed analysis and characterization of the errors made by these SOTA methods, we provide a clear set of recommended directions for future FGVC researchers.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Connor Anderson, Matt Gwilliam, Adam Teuscher, Andrew Merrill, Ryan Farrell. 2020-06-23. Facing the Hard Problems in FGVC. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.13190
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.