Edit Distance in Near-Linear Time: it's a Constant Factor

Alexandr Andoni; Negev Shekel Nosatzki

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2005.07678

Edit Distance in Near-Linear Time: it's a Constant Factor

Alexandr Andoni·Negev Shekel Nosatzki

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present an algorithm for approximating the edit distance between two strings of length $n$ in time $n^{1+\varepsilon}$ up to a constant factor, for any $\varepsilon>0$. Our result completes a research direction set forth in the recent breakthrough paper [Chakraborty-Das-Goldenberg-Kouck\`y-Saks, FOCS'18], which showed the first constant-factor approximation algorithm with a (strongly) sub-quadratic running time. The recent results of [Kouck\`y-Saks, STOC'20] and [Brakensiek-Rubinstein, STOC'20] have shown near-linear time algorithms that obtain an additive approximation, near-linear in $n$ (equivalently, constant-factor approximation when the edit distance value is close to $n$). In contrast, our algorithm obtains a constant-factor approximation in near-linear time for any input strings. In contrast to prior algorithms, which are mostly recursing over smaller substrings, our algorithm gradually smoothes out the local contribution to the edit distance over progressively larger substrings. To accomplish this, we iteratively construct a distance oracle data structure for the metric of edit distance on all substrings of input strings, of length $n^{i\varepsilon}$ for $i=0,1,\ldots,1/\varepsilon$. The distance oracle approximates the edit distance over these substrings in a certain average sense, just enough to estimate the overall edit distance.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Alexandr Andoni, Negev Shekel Nosatzki. 2020-05-15. Edit Distance in Near-Linear Time: it's a Constant Factor. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.07678

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗