arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2004.14755

Point-free theories of space and time

Dimiter Vakarelov
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The paper is in the field of Region Based Theory of Space (RBTS), sometimes called mereotopology. RBTS is a kind of point-free theory of space based on the notion of region. Its origin goes back to some ideas of Whitehead, De Laguna and Tarski to build the theory of space without the use of the notion of point. More information on RBTS and mereotopology can be found, for instance, in \cite{Vak2007}. Contact algebras present an algebraic formulation of RBTS and in fact give axiomatizations of the Boolean algebras of regular closed sets of some classes of topological spaces with an additional relation of contact. An exhaustive study of this theory is given in \cite{DiVak2006}. Dynamic contact algebra (DCA) \cite{Vak2014} (see also \cite{Vak2010,Vak2012}) introduced by the present author, is a generalization of contact algebra studying regions changing in time and presents a formal explication of Whitehead's ideas of integrated point-free theory of space and time. DCA is an abstraction of a special \emph{dynamic model of space}, called also \emph{snapshot} or \emph{cinematographic} model and the paper \cite{Vak2014} contains the expected representation theorem with respect to such models. In the present paper we introduce a new version of DCA which is a simplified version of the definition from \cite{Vak2014} and similar to that of \cite{Vak2012}. The aim is to use this version as a representative example of a DCA and to develop for this example not only the snapshot models but also topological models and the expected topological duality theory, generalizing in a certain sense the well known Stone duality for Boolean algebras. Abstract topological models of DCAs present a new view on the nature of space and time and show what happens if we are abstracting from their metric properties.

Explore related subjects

math.LO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Dimiter Vakarelov. 2020-04-28. Point-free theories of space and time. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.14755

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗