arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2003.09533

Testing Polynomials for Vanishing on Cartesian Products of Planar Point Sets: Collinearity Testing and Related Problems

Abstract

We present subquadratic algorithms, in the algebraic decision-tree model of computation, for detecting whether there exists a triple of points, belonging to three respective sets $A$, $B$, and $C$ of points in the plane, that satisfy a certain polynomial equation or two equations. The best known instance of such a problem is testing for the existence of a collinear triple of points in $A\times B\times C$, a classical 3SUM-hard problem that has so far defied any attempt to obtain a subquadratic solution, whether in the (uniform) real RAM model, or in the algebraic decision-tree model. While we are still unable to solve this problem, in full generality, in subquadratic time, we obtain such a solution, in the algebraic decision-tree model, that uses only roughly $O(n^{28/15})$ constant-degree polynomial sign tests, for the special case where two of the sets lie on two respective one-dimensional curves and the third is placed arbitrarily in the plane. Our technique is fairly general, and applies to many other problems where we seek a triple that satisfies a single polynomial equation, e.g., determining whether $A\times B\times C$ contains a triple spanning a unit-area triangle. This result extends recent work by Barba \etal~(2017) and by Chan (2018), where all three sets $A$,~$B$, and~$C$ are assumed to be one-dimensional. As a second application of our technique, we again have three $n$-point sets $A$, $B$, and $C$ in the plane, and we want to determine whether there exists a triple $(a,b,c) \in A\times B\times C$ that simultaneously satisfies two independent real polynomial equations. For example, this is the setup when testing for collinearity in the complex plane, when each of the sets $A$, $B$, $C$ lies on some constant-degree algebraic curve. We show that problems of this kind can be solved with roughly $O(n^{24/13})$ constant-degree polynomial sign tests.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Boris Aronov, Esther Ezra, Micha Sharir. 2020-03-21. Testing Polynomials for Vanishing on Cartesian Products of Planar Point Sets: Collinearity Testing and Related Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.09533

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG