arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2003.07695

Online Assortment and Market Segmentation under Bertrand Competition with Set-Dependent Revenues

Abstract

We consider an online assortment problem with $[n]:=\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ sellers, each holding exactly one item $i\in[n]$ with initial inventory $c_i\in \mathbb{Z}_+$, and a sequence of homogeneous buyers arriving over a finite time horizon $t=1,2,\ldots,m$. There is an online platform whose goal is to offer a subset $S_t\subseteq [n]$ of sellers to the arriving buyer at time $t$ to maximize the expected revenue derived over the entire horizon while respecting the inventory constraints. Given an assortment $S_t$ at time $t$, it is assumed that the buyer will select an item from $S_t$ based on the well-known multinomial logit model, a well-justified choice model from the economic literature. In this model, the revenue obtained from selling an item $i$ at a given time $t$ critically depends on the assortment $S_t$ offered at that time and is given by the Nash equilibrium of a Bertrand game among the sellers in $S_t$. This imposes a strong dependence/externality among the offered assortments, sellers' revenues, and inventory levels. Despite that challenge, we devise a constant competitive algorithm for the online assortment problem with homogeneous buyers. We also show that the online assortment problem with heterogeneous buyers does not admit a constant competitive algorithm. To compensate for that issue, we then consider the assortment problem under an offline setting with heterogeneous buyers. Under a mild market consistency assumption, we show that the generalized Bertrand game admits a pure Nash equilibrium over general buyer-seller bipartite graphs. Finally, we develop an $O(\ln m)$-approximation algorithm for optimal market segmentation of the generalized Bertrand game which allows the platform to derive higher revenues by partitioning the market into smaller pools.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

S. Rasoul Etesami. 2020-03-14. Online Assortment and Market Segmentation under Bertrand Competition with Set-Dependent Revenues. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.07695

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT