arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2003.06598

Closed-Loop Two-Stage Stochastic Optimization of Offshore Wind Farm Collection System

Abstract

A two-stage stochastic optimization model for the design of the closed-loop cable layout of an Offshore Wind Farm (OWF) is presented. The model consists on a Mixed Integer Linear Program (MILP) with scenario numeration incorporation to account for both wind power and cable failure stochasticity. The objective function supports simultaneous optimization of: (i) Initial investment (network topology and cable sizing), (ii) Total electrical power losses costs, and (iii) Reliability costs due to energy curtailment from cables failures. The mathematical optimization program is embedded in an iterative framework called PCI (Progressive Contingency Incorporation), in order to simplify the full problem while still including its global optimum. The applicability of the method is demonstrated by tackling a real-world instance. Results show the functionality of the tool in quantifying the economic profitability when applying stochastic optimization compared to a deterministic approach, given certain values of failure parameters.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Juan-Andrés Pérez-Rúa, Sara Lumbreras, Andrés Ramos, Nicolaos A. Cutululis. 2020-04-03. Closed-Loop Two-Stage Stochastic Optimization of Offshore Wind Farm Collection System. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596%2F1618%2F4%2F042031

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Aerial Wildfire Suppression Planning with a Hybrid CNN-Cellular Automata Fire Model

Aerial wildfire suppression requires decisions about when, where, and how to deploy limited aircraft. We present an intervention-design framework built on a frozen hybrid convolutional neural network and cellular automaton (CNN-CA) simulator trained jointly on six historical wildfires. First, we jointly optimize binary drop execution and continuous location and orientation, with aircraft-specific footprints, wind drift, and availability, turnaround, and grounded-day constraints. Second, we model water as an immediate transfer of burning probability to the unburned state and retardant as a persistent reduction in the fuel contribution to spread. Third, we remove drops by a rollout-verified backward elimination while limiting degradation in selected fire-performance metrics. Fourth, we evaluate fixed schedules under daily state sampling and a separate spatially correlated probability-field sensitivity test. Fifth, we compare the optimizer with random, tactical, greedy, and derivative-free planners under shared fleet, drop-budget, and simulator-evaluation allowances, and measure computational scaling. A 2020 Bear Fire case study considers two objectives: total fire-affected area and protected-region exposure. The two-stage total-area schedule reduces deterministic terminal extent by 89.5% relative to the simulator baseline with 1,111 drops. The nominal schedule is sensitive to small pose and effectiveness perturbations. The tactical heuristic is more economical at small evaluation allowances; the gradient planner achieves better objectives with more computation.

eess.SY

Paying for Space: Incentive-Aware Motion Planning for Multi-Agent Collision Avoidance

Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) systems require scalable coordination mechanisms to manage large fleets of aerial vehicles operating in shared, capacity-limited airspace. In such environments, different operators may have private preferences over trajectory characteristics, such as travel time, fuel consumption, or deviation from nominal routes. If centralized traffic management relies on self-reported preferences, operators may strategically misreport their costs to obtain more favorable trajectories. This paper proposes a multistage motion planning framework augmented with mechanism design to enable collision avoidance for AAM systems with privately known costs. The proposed approach integrates convex safe corridor construction with a VCG-inspired mechanism to ensure conflict-free passage through constrained airspace while incentivizing truthful revelation of private preferences. Simulation results demonstrate safe and decentralized coordination among agents with heterogeneous preferences.

eess.SY

Co-Investment with Payoff-Sharing Mechanism for Cooperative Decision-Making in Network Design Games

Network-based systems are inherently interconnected, with the design and performance of subnetworks being interdependent. However, the decisions of self-interested operators may lead to suboptimal outcomes for users and the overall system. This paper explores cooperative mechanisms that can simultaneously benefit both operators and users. We address this challenge using a game-theoretical framework that integrates both non-cooperative and cooperative game theory. In the non-cooperative stage, we propose a network design game in which subnetwork decision-makers strategically design local infrastructures. In the cooperative stage, co-investment with payoff-sharing mechanism is developed to enlarge collective benefits and fairly distribute them. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework, we conduct case studies on the Sioux Falls network and real-world public transport networks in Zurich and Winterthur, Switzerland. Our evaluation considers impacts on environmental sustainability, social welfare, and economic efficiency. The proposed framework provides a foundation for improving interdependent networked systems by enabling strategic cooperation among self-interested operators.

eess.SY